Pond Boss Magazine
https://www.pondboss.com/images/userfiles/image/20130301193901_6_150by50orangewhyshouldsubscribejpeg.jpg
Advertisment
Newest Members
BoomerTC35D, cjschuhmann, Teroni, EGS, Ben Davis
18,530 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums36
Topics41,013
Posts558,516
Members18,530
Most Online3,612
Jan 10th, 2023
Top Posters
esshup 28,606
ewest 21,512
Cecil Baird1 20,043
Bill Cody 15,159
Who's Online Now
8 members (Jason D, Don Kennedy, FishinRod, Theo Gallus, Angler8689, Sunil, Bill Cody, Theeck), 1,126 guests, and 296 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#167615 06/09/09 04:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458
Likes: 2
C
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Hall of Fame
Lunker
OP Offline
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Hall of Fame
Lunker
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458
Likes: 2
What are some opinions on sourcing each individual fish species you stock in your ponds from at least a couple different sources?

My opinion is it would be a good thing to do. Particularly in larger ponds where larger numbers of each fish species are going to be stocked. Even smaller ponds would benefit from the added genetic diversity of at least two different sources. If for example you planned to stock 1000 bluegill into your 2 acre pond, source 500 from one hatchery and another 500 from a different hatchery would be a good idea IMO.

After all, the original stocker fish are going to be the backbone of your future fishery. Attempt to find the original source if the hatcheries you buy your fish from does not culture the fish themselves. This way if you do get fish from two different hatcheries but they both source their fish from the same hatchery, there's no benefit of that. I suspect higher quality hatcheries are prudent in trying to keep genetic diversity in their fish high, but sourcing from at least a couple hatcheries only adds to that diversity and can't hurt.

Obviously species you don't intend to naturally reproduce in your pond, channel catfish for instance or fish that aren't capable of naturally reproducing in ponds, hybrid striped bass or walleye would not require this.

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,728
Likes: 287
R
RAH Offline
Lunker
Offline
Lunker
R
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,728
Likes: 287
This makes good biological sense to me. Adding some fish caught in other nearby waters might also help with genetic diversity (assuming you identify the fish species correctly and don't spread diseases or parasites). Hybrids between different strains should have improved vigor and allow for a greater numbers of different allels to be selected in any particular pond.

RAH #167627 06/09/09 04:57 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 939
M
Hall of Fame
Lunker
Offline
Hall of Fame
Lunker
M
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 939
Myself and three other pond owners have exchanged BG's and BC's a couple of times through out the last 7 years with the genetic thought in mind. I have no idea if it helps or not but our thought was diversity is good and it gives us another pond activity.
And remember when using multiple fish partners to practice safe fish exchanging. After all you, you can't be too careful with transmitted diseases. \:\)

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458
Likes: 2
C
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Hall of Fame
Lunker
OP Offline
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Hall of Fame
Lunker
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458
Likes: 2
 Originally Posted By: mnfish
And remember when using multiple fish partners to practice safe fish exchanging. After all you, you can't be too careful with transmitted diseases. \:\)


Now that's funny!

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 177
Likes: 17
L
Lunker
Offline
Lunker
L
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 177
Likes: 17
Certaintly don't think it would hurt. Brainstorming here. I wonder if this would be a way to "cure" a stunted pond. If you buy into the theory that stunted fish develop a genetic condition making them easier to stunt, perhaps adding some other genes would allow you to breed the habit out. Might be an interesting experiment if someone has a lot of time on there hands.

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4
D
Fingerling
Offline
Fingerling
D
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4
I would think it would help a stunted pond. As long as you're taking out more fish than you're putting in.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458
Likes: 2
C
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Hall of Fame
Lunker
OP Offline
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Hall of Fame
Lunker
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458
Likes: 2
I think the biggest factor in a stunted pond is the removal of large numbers of the stunted fish. Once you have done that and have things under control, the addition of new genetics may very well help.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Recent Posts
Happy Birthday Bob-O
by Pat Williamson - 05/16/24 07:53 AM
Optimal vs. Purina
by gehajake - 05/16/24 07:26 AM
recommendations for northern YP/SMB/BT pond
by Boondoggle - 05/15/24 09:13 PM
Repairing Dam with Culvert?
by jludwig - 05/15/24 12:21 PM
Pest Control around Pond
by Ortantyun - 05/15/24 11:22 AM
Building a sprayer for 10 acre farm pond
by Black Creek WW - 05/15/24 08:54 AM
Spotfin Shiners - Habitat, Cover and Structure
by canyoncreek - 05/14/24 07:06 PM
Tilapia with Winterkill
by Fishingadventure - 05/14/24 06:34 PM
Nested Mallards
by FishinRod - 05/14/24 02:48 PM
Happy Birthday Augie!
by Augie - 05/14/24 02:40 PM
What did you do at your pond today?
by FishinRod - 05/14/24 12:48 PM
Forest Pond in the White Mountains
by Lina - 05/14/24 07:04 AM
Newly Uploaded Images
Eagles Over The Pond Yesterday
Eagles Over The Pond Yesterday
by Tbar, December 10
Deer at Theo's 2023
Deer at Theo's 2023
by Theo Gallus, November 13
Minnow identification
Minnow identification
by Mike Troyer, October 6
Sharing the Food
Sharing the Food
by FishinRod, September 9
Nice BGxRES
Nice BGxRES
by Theo Gallus, July 28
Snake Identification
Snake Identification
by Rangersedge, July 12

� 2014 POND BOSS INC. all rights reserved USA and Worldwide

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5