Forums36
Topics40,963
Posts557,995
Members18,504
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 20,043 Likes: 1
Hall of Fame Lunker
|
OP
Hall of Fame Lunker
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 20,043 Likes: 1 |
Superfish OSU researcher uses a combination of hormones, selective breeding to create bigger bluegill
Sunday, April 26, 2009 3:33 AM By Doug Caruso THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH <p>OSU researcher Han-Ping Wang shows how male bluegill are larger than female.</p> Jeff Hinckley | DISPATCH
PIKETON, Ohio -- All of the fingerling bluegill swimming in the gray tank with a scarlet 36 on it look about the same.
But a quarter of them are "super males."
They're the key to growing ponds full of all-male bluegill. Since male bluegill grow twice as large as females, fish farmers can provide larger fillets for people's dinner plates. That would mean larger profits.
Han-Ping Wang, principal research scientist at Ohio State University's aquaculture lab in Piketon, is close to achieving that goal using a process that starts, oddly enough, with turning all the fish into females.
He introduced estrogen to tanks of bluegill that had a natural population of about half male and half female. In the right amounts, the hormone turns all the fish into egg-producing females.
Then Wang let genetics take over.
First, a quick primer on genes and gender: Genetic males have an X chromosome and a Y chromosome. Genetic females have two X chromosomes.
If the male's Y chromosome links up with the female's X chromosome, the offspring is male. If the male's X chromosome links up with a female X chromosome, the offspring is female.
In nature, it's a coin toss -- about half the babies turn up male; about half turn up female.
And it's all up to dad's genes.
So what happens when dad also lays the eggs?
Though they now produce eggs, the half that started as males keep their male X and Y chromosomes after the hormone treatment.
Those fish laid their eggs this past winter, and untreated males fertilized the eggs.
The result: Half the brood should be male with an X chromosome and a Y chromosome. A quarter should be female with two X chromosomes.
Another quarter should be "super males" with two Y chromosomes.
"That's what we need," Wang said.
Right now, Wang knows only that 75 percent of the fish in tank 36 are male. You can't tell bluegill fingerlings apart by looking at them, so he's developed genetic tests that reveal the gender. But he doesn't know which males carry the double-Y chromosome combination he's looking for.
When you put YY males in a tank with XX females, it's like making a coin toss with a two-headed quarter: Bet on boys every time because each offspring will get a Y chromosome from super dad and an X chromosome from mom.
In the next step, Wang will put individual males in breeding tanks with females. Whenever he sees an all-male brood, he'll know that the male has two Y chromosomes.
Wang knows that there's concern about hormone-treated food and hormones escaping into the environment where they can affect the natural breeding of species.
But he says that his method removes the hormone treatment from the farm.
He's also looking for hormone-free ways to get more male bluegill. Simply by controlling the temperature of the water in the first weeks of a brood's life, he's gotten as many as 90 percent of the fish to turn out male.
There is a market for bluegill, but prices are too high, said Doug Denny, owner of the Fish Guys in the North Market.
He sells whole bluegill, which he buys for $4 per pound. He estimates he'd have to charge about $9 per pound to offset the work put in to scale and fillet the fish. That puts it at about the same price as lake perch, which comes to him already processed.
"If I could get fillets at $6 a pound, I could sell it," Denny said.
At the U.S. Department of Agriculture's last count in 2007, there were 144 bluegill farms in Ohio, said Laura Tiu, an OSU aquaculture extension expert in Piketon.
She's the one who helps transfer research to the farmers who can use the information to produce bigger fish faster and potentially bring down the price.
Once he's identified the super males, Wang plans to look for genetic markers and develop a test to quickly identify them by clipping a bit of fin and analyze it in the lab.
They're looking for distinct genetic markers to help them identify the fish. They already have found seven such markers that help determine whether a young bluegill is male or female.
If he can grow enough super males, he can send them to farmers who can breed them with females to produce all-male broods.
Wang wants to treat some super males with estrogen to turn them into egg-producing females with two Y chromosomes. Call them "super mamas."
Breeding super males with super mamas would produce nothing but super males.
Then those super males can be sent out to breed with untreated females to produce ponds full of all-male fish.
Another option is harvesting the super male sperm, freezing it, and sending that out to the fish farmers.
"We would create the first bluegill sperm bank," Wang said.
"Our parents would be so proud!" Tiu joked.
dcaruso@dispatch.com
Last edited by Cecil Baird1; 04/29/09 12:19 PM.
If pigs could fly bacon would be harder to come by and there would be a lot of damaged trees.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,256
Lunker
|
Lunker
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,256 |
Wow. Neat story. I'll put my money on Bruce's male "super fish," though.
"Only after sorrow's hand has bowed your head will life become truly real to you; then you will acquire the noble spirituality which intensifies the reality of life. I go to an all-powerful God. Beyond that I have no knowledge--no fear--only faith."
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 13,975 Likes: 277
Moderator Lunker
|
Moderator Lunker
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 13,975 Likes: 277 |
... male bluegill grow twice as large as females ... Holy sunfish! I must have had 19 1/2 inch long Male BG in my pond last year!
"Live like you'll die tomorrow, but manage your grass like you'll live forever." -S. M. Stirling
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 20,043 Likes: 1
Hall of Fame Lunker
|
OP
Hall of Fame Lunker
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 20,043 Likes: 1 |
Wow. Neat story. I'll put my money on Bruce's male "super fish," though. Don't be surprised if Bruce is already making plans to take advantage of this technology. I know I will.
If pigs could fly bacon would be harder to come by and there would be a lot of damaged trees.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,854 Likes: 1
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,854 Likes: 1 |
Males grow twice as large as females? That's news to me.
Four out of the last six bluegill I saw that were legit two pounders were females.
Very interesting story. I wonder if this is one of those stories where they say it's just around the corner, and it ends up being 40 years.
I should mention that out of the last batch of CSBG I selected the 200 biggest fish and eventually reduced this group to the fastest growing 80. When I stocked them a couple of weeks ago, it looked like approximately 65 of the 80 were males.
Holding a redear sunfish is like running with scissors.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,596 Likes: 36
Lunker
|
Lunker
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,596 Likes: 36 |
Bruce are you breeding your CSBG with super female BG?
I agree, some of the biggest BG I have seen have been females, for some reason they are much rarer than big male BG.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 20,043 Likes: 1
Hall of Fame Lunker
|
OP
Hall of Fame Lunker
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 20,043 Likes: 1 |
The article says the females grow more slowly but I don't recall it said they were necessarily smaller? But I did scan it so I may have missed it.
One thing to keep in my is many times these writers misquote or take things out of context especially when it deals with science because they don't have the background. Dr. Wang is doing some impressive stuff, which has included producing a strain of yellow perch that have an increased growth rate of 40 percent over others.
Last edited by Cecil Baird1; 04/29/09 02:34 PM.
If pigs could fly bacon would be harder to come by and there would be a lot of damaged trees.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,499 Likes: 267
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
|
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,499 Likes: 267 |
Bluegills : Biology and Behavior , Spotte 2007 , AFS pg 124
Females are reported to lag behind males through age-0 , but no supporting data have been presented. After the first year the sexes appear to grow at similar rates, although territorial males ultimately grow larger. I analyzed age 1 through age 5 data ... from 4 Indiana lakes without finding significant differences in fork length. However in age 2 bluegills in Michigan ponds the males averaged 154.1 mm TL and females 142.6 mm , a 7.5 % disparity.
Handbook of Freshwater Fishery Biology V II , Carlander 1977 pg 105
Males grew more rapidly than females in some populations , but the differences were usually small. In other lakes no sexual difference in growth was detected , and in a few, females grew larger than males. (Cites omitted)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,854 Likes: 1
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,854 Likes: 1 |
Bluegills : Biology and Behavior , Spotte 2007 , AFS pg 124
Females are reported to lag behind males through age-0 , but no supporting data have been presented. After the first year the sexes appear to grow at similar rates, although territorial males ultimately grow larger. I analyzed age 1 through age 5 data ... from 4 Indiana lakes without finding significant differences in fork length. However in age 2 bluegills in Michigan ponds the males averaged 154.1 mm TL and females 142.6 mm , a 7.5 % disparity.
Handbook of Freshwater Fishery Biology V II , Carlander 1977 pg 105
Males grew more rapidly than females in some populations , but the differences were usually small. In other lakes no sexual difference in growth was detected , and in a few, females grew larger than males. (Cites omitted)
That's spot on with my experience. Good information.
Holding a redear sunfish is like running with scissors.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 2
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame Lunker
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 2 |
I wonder if they fish they are playing mad scientist with are being kept in a closed facility. I don't know if I would want their mutated genes and hormones getting lose in wild populations of fish... Interesting work though!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 20,043 Likes: 1
Hall of Fame Lunker
|
OP
Hall of Fame Lunker
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 20,043 Likes: 1 |
I wonder if they fish they are playing mad scientist with are being kept in a closed facility. I don't know if I would want their mutated genes and hormones getting lose in wild populations of fish... Interesting work though! Nope not closed to the public and one can visit or see the latest research on their website at any time. Basically they are working on producing the fastest growing bluegills and yellow perch they can for aquaculture purposes. However most of it is selective breeding. I do know they got yellow perch from several states to determine which grew the fastest and went from there.
Last edited by Cecil Baird1; 04/29/09 10:27 PM.
If pigs could fly bacon would be harder to come by and there would be a lot of damaged trees.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 2
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame Lunker
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 2 |
I meant more of the genetically and hormonally altered fish and escaping into wild waters and screwing things up... Kinds like salmon with halibut genes getting lose!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 20,043 Likes: 1
Hall of Fame Lunker
|
OP
Hall of Fame Lunker
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 20,043 Likes: 1 |
I meant more of the genetically and hormonally altered fish and escaping into wild waters and screwing things up... Kinds like salmon with halibut genes getting lose! The way it's done with the hormones the hormones aren't passed on. As far as selective breeding that's been going on for a long long time with domesticated animals. I don't think it's something to be afraid of.
If pigs could fly bacon would be harder to come by and there would be a lot of damaged trees.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,854 Likes: 1
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,854 Likes: 1 |
I meant more of the genetically and hormonally altered fish and escaping into wild waters and screwing things up... Kinds like salmon with halibut genes getting lose! I think you may be reading into the study some threats that really don't exist. I think that if all the fish escaped all it would mean is that you'd have a few extra males in the next generation. The rest is just simple selective breeding. Certainly nothing more than has been done with hogs, dogs, cattle, etc for centuries. Just being done with a little more sophistication maybe... ...actually, humans are treated with estrogen all the time, and we're not worried about it escaping into the wild. Hormones aren't contagious.
Holding a redear sunfish is like running with scissors.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,854 Likes: 1
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,854 Likes: 1 |
Bruce are you breeding your CSBG with super female BG?
I agree, some of the biggest BG I have seen have been females, for some reason they are much rarer than big male BG. Yes, and I had some real doozy females this year!!! I sampled three females that were over 11 inches since January 1! All of them are in the "program".
Holding a redear sunfish is like running with scissors.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 2
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame Lunker
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 2 |
My issue is, there aren't wild native cows, chickens etc in North America. There are wild BG and YP... Escaped fish with genetic alterations can cause issues with wild populations. We see that with pen raised quail getting lose and messing with the genetic integrity of wild quail for example. I'm a realist though and realize man has been moving fish all over the world and screwed most things up to a point of no return, so what the heck if some funky BG or YP get lose?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,854 Likes: 1
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,854 Likes: 1 |
Just to be clear, there's a difference between genetic alterations, and genetic manipulation. When you say "genetic alterations" that says to me that something on the DNA strand has been spliced, replaced, etc.
I don't think that's what's happening here.
I think they're just using basic math (and hormones) to change frequencies of X and Y chromosomes. That's "genetic manipulation". Zero risk to wild populations. Hormones aren't a dirty word. They're as natural and ubiquitous as blood, and interstitial fluid, and vitamins and keratin, etc. etc.
Seriously though, human's are treated with estrogen all the time, and then released into the wild population. I don't think there's any risk to those around us.
That being said, the individual fish being treated with hormones could be an issue if ingested, provided that the hormone used has a detrimental effect on the consumer. But I don't think that's what we're talking about.
I guess I'll just respectfully disagree that this sort of study poses a risk to mankind. If anything I think it has fabulous potential to benefit humans. Bluegill are delicious, but they're not really economical for growout. If it weren't for science and their efforts to improve food production I'd shudder to think where this world would be.
Holding a redear sunfish is like running with scissors.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 20,043 Likes: 1
Hall of Fame Lunker
|
OP
Hall of Fame Lunker
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 20,043 Likes: 1 |
Bruce are you breeding your CSBG with super female BG?
I agree, some of the biggest BG I have seen have been females, for some reason they are much rarer than big male BG. Yes, and I had some real doozy females this year!!! I sampled three females that were over 11 inches since January 1! All of them are in the "program". I had a perch producer and extension agent at Ohio State tell me to use the largest males in my breeding to produce the largest female perch. Perhaps those large females would play more of a part than you are aware of?
If pigs could fly bacon would be harder to come by and there would be a lot of damaged trees.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 20,043 Likes: 1
Hall of Fame Lunker
|
OP
Hall of Fame Lunker
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 20,043 Likes: 1 |
Just to be clear, there's a difference between genetic alterations, and genetic manipulation. When you say "genetic alterations" that says to me that something on the DNA strand has been spliced, replaced, etc.
I don't think that's what's happening here.
I think they're just using basic math (and hormones) to change frequencies of X and Y chromosomes. That's "genetic manipulation". Zero risk to wild populations. Hormones aren't a dirty word. They're as natural and ubiquitous as blood, and interstitial fluid, and vitamins and keratin, etc. etc.
Seriously though, human's are treated with estrogen all the time, and then released into the wild population. I don't think there's any risk to those around us.
That being said, the individual fish being treated with hormones could be an issue if ingested, provided that the hormone used has a detrimental effect on the consumer. But I don't think that's what we're talking about.
I guess I'll just respectfully disagree that this sort of study poses a risk to mankind. If anything I think it has fabulous potential to benefit humans. Bluegill are delicious, but they're not really economical for growout. If it weren't for science and their efforts to improve food production I'd shudder to think where this world would be.
We had chickens once that put on weight so fast some of them could not support their weight on their legs. Now if a bluegill grew that fast he wouldn't be so bad off underwater. If we could grow bluegills as large as tires it would be almost impossible to get them in with an brush or trees around!
Last edited by Cecil Baird1; 04/29/09 10:33 PM.
If pigs could fly bacon would be harder to come by and there would be a lot of damaged trees.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 2
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame Lunker
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 2 |
I guess I wasn't clear in what I was trying to say. It doesn't appear they are genetically altering the fish. They are just selectively breeding them for desired traits and then treating them with hormones.
The odds of it affecting wild fish populations is probably slim... For one, the odds of the fish escaping is unlikely. Fish treated with hormones are not going to affect other wild fish even if they did escape. My concern is what the affects of selectively bred fish would have on the gene pool of wild fish should they escape. Would the addition of genetics not necessarily found in wild fish be harmful to the wild population should fish escape and successfully spawn with wild fish?
Even though fish maybe the same species or even the same subspecies, even fish populations from adjacent drainages have often been separated for thousands of years. This separation has no doubt led to genetic differences(however slight they may be), between the populations in each drainage. Although the biotic and abiotic factors in each drainage are similar, they are slightly different and each population will evolve to best survive those conditions.
When humans remove fish from the wild and breed them in an aquaculture facility, even if no intentional selective breeding is done, the selection if over a long enough period is going to be for survival in a aquaculture facility, not in the wild. Rainbow trout are a prime example of this... Many strains have been in captivity for so long, they do very poor when released into the wild.
IMO, when it comes to BG and YP or most other species of North American fishes, this is a minor worry compared to the many other more serious threats wild fish populations face in a human altered world...
And yes, there would be a lot more hungry and even starving people if it weren't for genetically altered and selectively bred food products, everything for soybeans to corn and chickens to cows... However, some of those genetic alteration and selective breeding have affected the wild populations from which those original food species came from. Its just the price we pay for being in a modern world where humans have far out surpassed the natural carrying capacity. Humans are just smart enough to alter their environment to allow more humans to live with a set amount of natural resources.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,854 Likes: 1
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,854 Likes: 1 |
Very nicely stated.
I don't think there's really any difference in what we're stating. Just slightly different angles of perspective, so I'd like to move away from anything that would seem like an argument.
What I'd like to do, with your permission, is use this thread to broaden the discussion.
I'd like to pose the following questions. They may seem somewhat rhetorical, but in actuality, I don't know the answers.
How do we define "wild" populations? It seems like we sometimes stray a little when we use this term. Is it a term that encompasses populations that were present from a particular point in time? If I genetically alter pheasants, then release them on my farm, can they affect the "wild" population? Or is that population not wild because they were brought from China a few decades ago?
What constitutes genetic change? Does it have to be man-made, or does it include the natural selection process that occurs in only a few generations in a sequestered group of individuals? In other words, if you willingly move fish from a creek to a pond, is that any different than moving "laboratory" fish into a stream? If the fish in the creek are selected to "creek life" after several generations, is that not the same as moving "laboratory" fish into a creek? Just wondering...
Since humans are animals too, are our actions considered "unnatural" just because we're human, or are our actions "natural" because we're part of nature? Why does human activity get special labeling? Is it because we're smarter? Or do we just think we're smarter?
If humans willingly eradicated elephants from the world in the next five years, which we undoubtedly could do, why is this considered tampering with, and negatively affecting nature? If we're part of nature itself, isnt' this natural? Just wondering....
If a population of coyotes eliminated all of the worlds remaining black-footed ferrets, is this a "natural" or "unnatural" act? Is it different than the humans eliminating the elephants? Or do we just "know better"?
Just wondering....
BTW, we'll never be able to answer these questions....only speculate. Our part in nature makes it impossible for us to objectively view the questions. JMHO.
Holding a redear sunfish is like running with scissors.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 2
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame Lunker
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 2 |
Sorry for hijacking this thread, I'll make a new post for Bruce and I as well as others to expand on this topic...
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 13,975 Likes: 277
Moderator Lunker
|
Moderator Lunker
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 13,975 Likes: 277 |
How do we define "wild" populations? I'm especially interested in those wild human populations.
"Live like you'll die tomorrow, but manage your grass like you'll live forever." -S. M. Stirling
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,365
Lunker
|
Lunker
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,365 |
Normally, it takes a large effort to create a populaiton of genetically manipulated creatures. When left to themselves, they quickly revert to their natural state. Animal genetics that have evolved over millions of years are very powerful. Even true genetic alteration will quickly be supressed unless it creates a powerful reproductive or survival advantage, which is unlikely.
I would love to have a commercial source for some of those maga-males!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,285 Likes: 1
Lunker
|
Lunker
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,285 Likes: 1 |
Hasn't this exact thing already been done with Tilapia and the reason most tilapia stock for grow out purposes are 98% male? I don't think the concept is new by any stretch, maybe just new to bluegill. I'd be really interested in female only LMB, especially feed trained...same for perch too.
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." Stephen W. Hawking
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|