Forums36
Topics40,944
Posts557,782
Members18,481
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
10 members (Augie, Bill Cody, Groundhog7, Sunil, gehajake, CentexSaj, catscratch, wps456, teehjaeh57, Shorthose),
886
guests, and
239
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,490 Likes: 265
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
|
OP
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,490 Likes: 265 |
A Comparison of Cedar Trees and Fabricated Polypropylene
Modules as Fish Attractors in a Strip Mine Impoundment
ROBERT E. ROLD
THOMAS S. McCoMiSH
DONALD E. VAN METER
The objective of our research was to evaluate
two types of fish attractors in a strip mine impoundment
to determine their relative effectiveness
in concentrating fish. The structures that we
used as attractors and compared were brush units
of eastern red cedar trees Juniperus virginiana and
fabricated polypropylene modules.
To evaluate attractors and controls, scuba dives
were conducted approximately every 2 weeks from
July 21 to October 24, 1986. Dives
We believe that the greater attraction of fish to
the brush attractors was due to the smaller interstitial
spaces (denseness) the brush attractors provided
compared with the modules. This is sup
ported by other studies (Johnson et al. 1988; Lynch
and Johnson 1989) in which bluegills preferred
small (40-mm) interstitial spaces over medium
(150-mm) and large (350-mm) interstitial spaces.
The small interstitial spacing is attractive because
it reduces vulnerability to predators (Walters et al.
1991) by reducing visual encounters between prey
and predator and by reducing predator feeding efficiency
(Crowder and Cooper 1979).
The majority of the largemouth bass observed
in our study were 260-300 mm long. Prince and
Maughan (1979b) found that largemouth bass prefer
deep (4.6-6.0 m) reefs to shallow (1.5 m) reefs.
Larger-size largemouth bass might have been observed
more often had our attractors been deeper.
Fish that
were 10 cm total length or larger were counted at all
study locations and included bluegill Lepomis macrochirus.
redbreast sunlish L. auritus. largemouth bass Micropterus
salmoides. green sunrtsh L cyanellus. crappies
Pomoxis spp.. and channel cattish Ictalurus punctatus.
Of the 623 fish observed during eight dives, brush attractors
held 78%. module atlractors 17%, and control
areas 5%. Comparison of attractors by dale and species
revealed a tendency for ihem lo attract more fish in July
and Augusi lhan in Seplember and October.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,973
Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,973 |
seems like Eric it proved what we already knew, dense for "bream" species is prefferred.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,365
Lunker
|
Lunker
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,365 |
I think cedar is preferred by 99 out of 100 fish hooks.
I bet if the BG had no choice, many more would have been taking cover in the artificial cover.
Last edited by bobad; 03/10/09 08:12 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,615 Likes: 5
Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,615 Likes: 5 |
Man Ewest, you better watch your back, Bill Dance is going to be gunning for you.
JHAP ~~~~~~~~~~ "My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives." ...Hedley Lamarr (that's Hedley not Hedy)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,490 Likes: 265
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
|
OP
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,490 Likes: 265 |
Its not me but the science he may have a problem with.
BTW the study did not use PFA aka sputnik balls but stand-up pvc structures (like tall weeds).
As bobad notes there are other reasons people might use PFA , B'ski logs , bobad floating stake fields , pvc trees and tires etc rather than natural material. There is a lot to consider wrt type and placement of structure/cover including the science of which works better ,how and why. That is the reason I started this thread to get some structure talk going.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 686
Lunker
|
Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 686 |
I bet if the BG had no choice, many more would have been taking cover in the artificial cover. I think this is a valid point...you have to work with what ya got!
Get out and fish.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,490 Likes: 265
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
|
OP
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,490 Likes: 265 |
One of the points the study made was that for public lakes (no $ for improvements) the trees were free while the pvc structures cost. Public lake managers often get fishermen to pick up xmas trees and bring them to the lake and have a work day to place them. You can pick up used xmas trees for free and use them.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,365
Lunker
|
Lunker
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,365 |
the trees were free while the pvc structures cost. I cringe every time I see the term "PVC". To me, PVC means the white PVC pipe rated for indoor plumbing. That stuff is breathtakingly expensive in any quantity. Don't know if they still make thinwall black polyethylene irrigation pipe, but it's much cheaper. It comes in rolls, and your trees may come out a little banana shaped. You could turn the curve upward so the trees come out more perky looking. It should be much more affordable than PVC. The trunks may still have to be PVC, as I don't know if you can get 4" polyethylene irrigation pipe.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 834
Lunker
|
Lunker
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 834 |
Wasn't there a link posted on the PBF before about a state that did a study on conifers vs hardwood vs man-made cribs? I recall that the conifers were preferred by fish followed by hardwoods, then the cribs. From what I can see at Bremer Pond, wood holds more fish than plastic. That is just my opinion. I would think that any type of structure is better than none.
Good morning Dave, I've checked the ships systems, and everything appears to be running normally.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,490 Likes: 265
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
|
OP
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,490 Likes: 265 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 834
Lunker
|
Lunker
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 834 |
ewest, Nope, scoured the internet, I think this is the study I saw: http://ohioline.osu.edu/a-fact/0001.html
Good morning Dave, I've checked the ships systems, and everything appears to be running normally.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 2
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame Lunker
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 2 |
I would have to imagine that fish prefer wood over PVC not only because of the tighter spaces to hide in, but the microbes, invertebrates that wood almost definitely prefer a natural material to call home over plastic... More inverts mean more food for fish, and those fish mean more food for bigger fish!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 686
Lunker
|
Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 686 |
While were on the topic, have we ever decided how long a cedar pile will last, if it stays underwater at all times? 5years? 20 years? eternity?
Get out and fish.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 2
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame Lunker
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 2 |
I think the key is keeping it submerged... Cedar will last well over 10 years probably closer to 20 but much of the thinner parts will have rotted away by then.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 941
Lunker
|
Lunker
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 941 |
What I have seen is softwoods (christmas trees) last 5 to 7 year beofre all that is left is the trunk and maybe larger branches. Hardwoods can last forever though most will say 30 years.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,490 Likes: 265
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
|
OP
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,490 Likes: 265 |
How long xmas trees remain is a good question. Here is some info. It depends on the pond and water. In our pond this tree is 5 years old - no air exposure.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 100
Lunker
|
Lunker
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 100 |
When adding structure to ponds, I use cedar or mock orange as a first choice with hickory and other stout hardwoods coming in second. Softer woods can be used and christmas trees can come cheap and easy at the right time, but for paying customers I don't take chances. I like to mix in some plastic structures with wood and rock throughout the lake and mark them differently. I find that during different times of the year and even week to week fish tend to relate to all of these different forms of cover better than the others. I do not have a scientific answer for this, but I learned long ago that managing a fishery is equal parts science and art. The plastic and rock also provide easier angling opportunities (snagless) for young and novice anglers to learn how to fish in cover. This is often overlooked but very important. I have often seen children discouraged and even chided by their dad for fishing in and getting snagged in cover. That, however is often where the fishing is best. Anyway, just another perspective.
-HH
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,074
Lunker
|
Lunker
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,074 |
HoneyHole
Making the fishing fun for the kids should be our main job. That was a good point.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,094 Likes: 1
Lunker
|
Lunker
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,094 Likes: 1 |
do you anchor christmas trees? i have heard that cedar will sink and stay in place with no anchor if placed when green.
Scott Hanners
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|