|
Forums36
Topics40,964
Posts558,005
Members18,506
| |
Most Online3,612
Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
|
6 members (Snipe, Boondoggle, Fishingadventure, phinfan, catscratch, Sunil),
1,071
guests, and
213
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3
Junior Member
|
OP
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3 |
 I was wondering if you have any thoughts as to which way is more efficient. I have a 1/2 acre 10/15' deep pond; two springs (100/150 gpm); plus 150 arce watershed with field tiles and two neighbors septic systems to deal with. I have chara on 80% of bottom and floating algea on 10% of the surface. Thanks in advance, Glen
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 37
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 37 |
Glen,
Bio-enzymes will not due any good on your aquatic weeds. They only assist with nutrient reduction and your black muck, should you have any. I would suggest treating the Chara and surface algae with Cutrine Plus (liquid or granular). If you choose to use the liquid you must dilute it 9:1 with water. Any questions, you can email me.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 11
Junior Member
|
|
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 11 |
Watergirl,
I thought the Microbe treatment would be a longer term solution to the problem. The cutrine will only last a short while. Would the bacteria not continously work to remove the stuff that makes the algae grow?
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57 |
|
