Here are 2 sources. I almost wish I didn't look as there is almost as much on cat crosses as lepomis crosses.
http://srac.tamu.edu/tmppdfs/8989590-190fs.pdf Reproduction among Channel Catfish, Blue Catfish,
and Their F1 and F2 Hybrids
REX A. DUNHAM* AND BRAD J. ARGUE1
Department of Fisheries and Allied Aquacultures, Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station,
Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, USA
Abstract.—Reproductive traits of the channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus, the blue catfish I. furcatus,
their F1 hybrid—channel catfish female 3 blue catfish male—and their F2 hybrid were
examined. The absence of reproductive isolating mechanisms in F1 and F2 generations is important
in terms of allowing for breeding programs for the development of a synthetic breed that has the
best culture traits from the two species. Conversely, if reproductive fitness is high in F1 and F2
generations, the possibility of introgression with the parent species in the natural environment
increases, thereby increasing the potential for risk from F1 generation (and higher) hybrids. F2
hybrid females had a lower frequency of ovulation (P , 0.05; 12.2%) than did channel catfish,
blue catfish, and F1 hybrid catfish (83.5, 58.4, and 56.5%, respectively) when these females were
induced to spawn with carp pituitary extract and were then hand-stripped. F2 hybrids that ovulated
produced fewer eggs per kilogram of body weight (P , 0.05) (923 eggs/kg) than did channel
catfish, blue catfish, and F1 hybrid catfish (7,893; 5,600; and 5,676 eggs/kg, respectively). The F1
hybrid had smaller testes per kilogram of body weight than did channel catfish (P , 0.05) (1.08
and 2.72 g/kg, respectively), but it did not have smaller testes than blue catfish (1.71 g/kg). Channel
catfish eggs had better fertilization (73.6%) than did F3 hybrid eggs (5.1%, P , 0.05). Channel
catfish eggs also had the highest observed hatch (41.5%). Channel catfish maternal genetic effects
had a strong positive effect on fertilization percentage, whereas channel catfish–additive genetic
effects had a strong positive effect on hatching percentage. Individual epistatic recombination loss
had a strong negative effect on hatching percentage. F1 hybrids rarely laid eggs when backcrossed
to parent species in aquaria. F2 hybrids did not naturally spawn in open ponds, in the pens in
ponds, or in aquaria. F2 breakdown was apparent, and backcrossing was naturally difficult. These
reproductive problems in hybrids will make development of synthetic breeds from channel catfish
and blue catfish difficult and will reduce the likelihood of introgression between the two species
in the natural environment.
Having trouble with second source.