This was on Facebook yesterday....Fisheries Biologist Steven Bardin11 hrs ·
Your chance to comment on the proposed rule changes to increase the lethal take of cormorants is closing March 9th. So far they have 867 comments, most in favor of increasing harvest. If you need a bit of motivation for your comment here is what I posted.
"Over the past two decades fisheries management of private small impoundments has grown in popularity throughout the U.S. Through this private landowners have become educated on the value of their fisheries resources both to their overall property valuation as well as for recreational usage. These landowners now annually invest in their small impoundments through the purchase of various species of fish, hiring of private biologist to assess fish populations, improvements to water quality, and additions of fish structures and feeders.
Cormorant predation of free swimming fishes in small impoundments although not significantly researched by academia appears from observation to be much more sever then larger water bodies. Primarily this is due to the fact that small impoundments are shallower, have lower surface area to habitat ratios, have higher density fish populations, and in many causes are continually stocked with fish. The issue with continual fish stocking is magnified by the fact that commercially available fish typically have body lengths within the preferred forage size range of cormorants. To complicate this further current deterrent methods do not appear to provide long term relief from cormorant predation for these property owners. The lack of ability to adequately protect their investments, specifically free swimming fishes, from predation via migratory birds including double crested cormorants has become demoralizing.
At this time with the proposed changes to take of double crested cormorants it is time to not only implement a state depredation order but also, allow states to begin issuing private property owners state depredation permits. State depredation permitting will finally allow private property owners the ability to protect their financial investment in their fisheries. Allowing the take of cormorants on private waterbodies via state permitting would likely have little to no impact on the U.S. bird population but would give property owners a more effective tool for deterrent of these birds. Property owners who actively engage in fisheries management would also likely be individuals that would participate in voluntarily population counts, keep and report records of take, and support further research of cormorant impacts."
To make a comment:https://www.regulations.gov/docket?...oPT82r9ufi8jyWCnESmDlxbU4tqC7F_94kGuP-BU