So I have been having this crazy thought - 04/03/10 02:50 AM
As I have actually started looking at home properties in the Southern California area(Within driving distance of LA) especially in my pricerange. I have been discovering some interesting things.
1) Without a creek or stream or something keeping a pond full by natural means will be very difficult given our low amount of rainfall and that any water will most likely have to come from a faucet or well.
2) It is not an option to just have an awesome well. I read guys on here talk about their well pumping 50,100,200+ gallons per minute. From what I can tell, a really good well down here pumps 10, and your most likely looking at 5. Which i don't remember exactly what the rate of evaporation is, but I think it would be a tough battle.
So from what I gather most people in Ca build a pond to be super deep so when it drops 7 feet in the summer its still a decent watering hole.
So here is what I have been thinking. I will probably end up with a pond in the .10-.25 acre range, as most properties we look at are about an acre or so. And I have been thinking, if i have to pay to top it off with water, how would the idea of a very shallow pond work. Say something in the vein of 2-3 ft deep over that amount of land. The reason I was thinking about this is because it would cost less to keep it full.
(I understand a 9 foot deep pond down 6 feet will be the same amount of water, but it would sure look nicer to be full)
I don't really need to worry about freezing, as we don't get snow, or anything like that, and none of the small community ponds I have ever seen freeze.
I think my main issue will be weed growth, which I haven't figured out all the answers to yet.
So lets talk about it. The viability of a very shallow pond, pros, cons, if it would work at all. You guys are the experts, im a noob, just throwing out ideas.
Pond Goals: Pretty, nice to sit by, occasional fishing primarily for my young cousins. And myself really, I love me some panfish.
1) Without a creek or stream or something keeping a pond full by natural means will be very difficult given our low amount of rainfall and that any water will most likely have to come from a faucet or well.
2) It is not an option to just have an awesome well. I read guys on here talk about their well pumping 50,100,200+ gallons per minute. From what I can tell, a really good well down here pumps 10, and your most likely looking at 5. Which i don't remember exactly what the rate of evaporation is, but I think it would be a tough battle.
So from what I gather most people in Ca build a pond to be super deep so when it drops 7 feet in the summer its still a decent watering hole.
So here is what I have been thinking. I will probably end up with a pond in the .10-.25 acre range, as most properties we look at are about an acre or so. And I have been thinking, if i have to pay to top it off with water, how would the idea of a very shallow pond work. Say something in the vein of 2-3 ft deep over that amount of land. The reason I was thinking about this is because it would cost less to keep it full.
(I understand a 9 foot deep pond down 6 feet will be the same amount of water, but it would sure look nicer to be full)
I don't really need to worry about freezing, as we don't get snow, or anything like that, and none of the small community ponds I have ever seen freeze.
I think my main issue will be weed growth, which I haven't figured out all the answers to yet.
So lets talk about it. The viability of a very shallow pond, pros, cons, if it would work at all. You guys are the experts, im a noob, just throwing out ideas.
Pond Goals: Pretty, nice to sit by, occasional fishing primarily for my young cousins. And myself really, I love me some panfish.