|
Forums36
Topics40,944
Posts557,788
Members18,483
| |
Most Online3,612
Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
|
9 members (Bill Cody, Snipe, Dave Davidson1, FishinRod, Bucyrus22B, Rangersedge, JPierson, MidwestCass, catscratch),
1,060
guests, and
194
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 16
|
OP
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 16 |
After conducting a good bit of research into old threads, I have a beginners question:
If you're attempting to rebuild a 5-6ac lake bed that has grown up in the last 40 years, is completely clearing the site to solid clay the only avenue? If I have the acreage logged, and leave a majority of the stumps underwater, does that induce problems?
I'm not sure if leaking would ever be a problem, as this old lake bed has 2 creeks that feed it year round.
The current trees average 8 inches and are mostly yellow poplar, sweet gums, and 2in maples- nothing with tanic acid.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,490 Likes: 265
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014  Lunker
|
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,490 Likes: 265 |
Do a test borehole and see clay content. If you have good clay basin then leave the stumps (at varying heights) for structure. However if swimming is a goal don't leave stumps where you will swim into them. A good idea to leave groups of stumps to aggerate fish. Don't leave the entire bottom with stumps ( some clean bottom and with groups of stumps).
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 16
|
|
OP
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 16 |
Got it! Thanks. If clay is solid, then I'll remove saplings, but keep the larger trees in groups- leave stumps at the lowest height possible
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57 |
|
.gif)
