Forums36
Topics41,061
Posts559,051
Members18,564
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
12 members (JoeDK, Theeck, Augie, Jake D., LANGSTER, esshup, catscratch, Justin W, Tinylake, FishinRod, Theo Gallus, BJ Nick),
695
guests, and
527
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 222
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 222 |
John, when you formed the dam, did you notice the amount of sand, clay, and rocks/gravel ratio during the development of the dam? #1 to #4 all plays a critical role in defining what happened to the water, but NRCS forgot to mention that the voids also increased when you have rocks/gravels within that dam, generating higher seepage volume through the soil medium.
I live right across from the 131,000+ acre feet lake that our office oversees the seismic retrofit of the lake's dam. There must be a non-gravel/rock mixture barrier in the first half (required) to 3/4 (highly recommended) compacted soil medium to prevent seepage. Horizontal hydrological migration is always a factor for the so called "water table" seepage. Compact of clay layer is standard to minimize hydrological migration. But, rock/gravel contents within that compact/non-compacted layer plays a critical role in determining the seepage load.
Geologists and soil engineers in my office would not let me off the hook if I don't mention this to you.
Leo
* Knowledge and experience yield wisdom. Sharing wisdom expand the generations with crucial knowledge. Unshared wisdom is worth nothing more than rotting manure.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|