Forums36
Topics41,038
Posts558,772
Members18,552
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
12 members (Murdog, Sunil, Ron crismon, Boondoggle, Nolan, Justin W, Augie, FireIsHot, FishinRod, Alligatorob, SCFarms, nycfishrescue),
1,153
guests, and
424
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15
Ambassador Lunker
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15 |
Thank you everyone!! I believe I will just plan on losing some and leave the spillway alone. It did a wonderful job for 22 inches of rain.I guess I better not mess with something working that well. I have probably found another 100 one inch cnbg in a couple of pockets in the last couple of days. So I RETURNED over 300 back into the pond. I bet I didn't see 25 dead ones all together.This because I caught it so soon. The water rushing over the spillway was never over 6 inch deep. Today it is just a small trickle and will probably stop running all together by tomorrow evening!! Prayers to everyone affected by the storm!! My little problem is soooo minor!! In my opinion that's a good call. Sounds like your spillway did its job well. Better to lose a few fish every few years rather than the dam itself.
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|