Rah...I can create questions that would create a poll where 98% of scientists would accept almost anything. If the only "evidence" that can be brought to a reasoned debate is....."they say so", there is nothing more that can be said. I do wonder...how many of those 98% also believe in Creation, or religion? Wouldn't any number over 2% cast huge doubt over the accuracy of a 98% poll? And IF more than 2% claimed other beliefs as well, wouldn't a reasonable person think someone is either lying, going with the popular belief, or some combination?

All I, want is some modicum of proof. Give me data and information that can produce reasonably accurate, repeatable, observable, and quantitative results....not some, "because they say so" stuff...

98% of "scientists" that used admittedly manipulated/corrected data comes no where near that basic standard

Last edited by Rainman; 01/21/16 03:14 PM.