Anyone else remember the story told by Bob Lusk about meeting with... (was it Griffin?) concerning the largemouth feed being developed?
Where the fellow opens the drawer and pulls out a dog turd looking little thing, and announces that this is the nutritional equivalent of a trout?
Maybe I'm thinking of something else.
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.
| 
