|
Forums36
Topics41,061
Posts559,032
Members18,564
| |
Most Online3,612
Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
|
9 members (Fishingadventure, JoeDK, Knobber, Bill Cody, James Herndon, catscratch, Bobbss, Thirdy8special, Bigtrh24),
730
guests, and
434
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15
Ambassador Lunker
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15 |
A fellow can figure out a lot of things by just stopping long enough to observe the fish while they're feeding. Shoot, some of it might even pertain to ponds/fish.
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57 |
|
