|
Forums36
Topics41,050
Posts558,884
Members18,557
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
9 members (SHORTCREEK, Boondoggle, Thirdy8special, FireIsHot, Theo Gallus, Bigtrh24, 4CornersPuddle, catscratch, tim k),
850
guests, and
371
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15
Ambassador Lunker
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15 |
I agree...might be a put and take pellet fed fishery which isn't a bad thing - sounds FAR simpler to achieve goals frankly without population metrics across multiple species to manage.
I couldn't agree more.
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|