Forums36
Topics41,051
Posts558,905
Members18,557
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
8 members (RStringer, 4CornersPuddle, Fishingadventure, John Fitzgerald, Thirdy8special, Bill Cody, esshup, Theo Gallus),
811
guests, and
274
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15
Ambassador Lunker
|
OP
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15 |
Bill, thank you for the excellent suggestion. It would appear that your efforts might yet bear fruit, as I too find myself in favor of "ENHANCED Brim", provided that capitalization remain mandatory. I am unsure of just what is meant by the vague and hauntingly bitter sounding diatribe regarding the word ENHANCEMENT, but I am willing to concede that others may well have endured disappointments that, while unknown to me, have caused them great frustration.
So in that light, perhaps the search for a suitable designation should continue.
"AUGMENTED Brim"
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|