Forums36
Topics41,065
Posts559,129
Members18,568
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
8 members (FishinRod, JasonInOhio, Angler8689, Rudly68, Tinylake, Fishingadventure, bemdh8, gehajake),
657
guests, and
395
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 20,043 Likes: 1
Hall of Fame Lunker
|
Hall of Fame Lunker
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 20,043 Likes: 1 |
Originally posted by Theo Gallus: Oh, crud, Cecil, I just realized I could be construed as trying to walk over your production methods - which I think are outstandingly successful.
So I should try to amend my comment to say "I've never understood using dye while trying to grow more pounds of fish using phytoplankton as the main food supply," or I should just keep my mouth shut (but that would probably always be a good option for me, as you already know).Not a problem Theo. I just wanted to show you it works for me. Please don't keep quiet as I enjoy your posts. I agree 100 percent if a person had a recreational pond, and did not feed or only fed sparadically that the dye would stifle the productivity of the pond.
If pigs could fly bacon would be harder to come by and there would be a lot of damaged trees.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|