Forums36
Topics41,061
Posts559,053
Members18,564
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
10 members (LANGSTER, Omaha, FishinRod, Augie, Theeck, JoeDK, Jake D., esshup, catscratch, Justin W),
701
guests, and
542
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,973
Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,973 |
Scott I agree not alot seen but not neccesary plenty enough info from what they say and you see. The bass looked to be 75% Wr or less and biggest bass little under 14" and big bluegill. Nuff said.
Cary that is funny I learn when around you, we each have our area of expertise. Nex time in town we can plan around a electrofishing survey.
Just let the wife and son view it and did not make a comment. She was mad and said what are they talking about they don't have enough bream and they need to start pulling out those little bass then they can get the bigger bass back they used to have- Yes can you tell we have been married for 9 years.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|