|
Forums36
Topics41,080
Posts559,325
Members18,576
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
11 members (Bill Cody, Ron crismon, Angler8689, SENKOSAM, Culnby8, Theo Gallus, Pat Williamson, 4CornersPuddle, catscratch, Alligatorob, KenHorton),
662
guests, and
382
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,541 Likes: 282
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
|
OP
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,541 Likes: 282 |
Here is another bit of interesting HSB info from :
Comparison of Bluegill Consumption Rates by Largemouth Bass and Sunshine Bass in Structured and Nonstructured Artificial Environments
CHRISTOPHER W. HICKEY AND CHRISTOPHER C. KOHLER
Wild Largemouth Bass versus Wild Sunshine Bass
Largemouth bass were more adept at consuming bluegills than sunshine bass in the presence of structure ; bluegill instantaneous mortality rate was significantly higher for largemouth bass than for sunshine bass predation. Conversely, consumption on bluegills by largemouth bass and sunshine bass was similar in nonstructured tanks .
Wild versus Pellet-Trained Predators
Sunshine bass.—Wild and pellet-trained sunshine bass in structured and nonstructured tanks consumed bluegills at similar rates in their respective treatments. Bluegill instantaneous mortality rates in structured tanks did not differ significantly between wild and pellet-trained sunshine bass; similarly, in nonstructured tanks the bluegill instantaneous mortality rate in the presence of wild and pellet-trained sunshine bass did not differ significantly.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|