Pond Boss
Posted By: cougar advice on forage fish - 07/18/09 02:39 AM
Hello..
an update on my pond....levee complete...it will be 9ft max...it will be 1 3/4 acres...(decided not to buy the additional land to move the levee down and build the larger pond....

Question: what type of forage fish should i stock here in NE Mississippi? I see on here people advising FHM and golden shiners a lot. I want to have BG/RES/LMB (unless one of the experts thinks that is a bad idea), but I wanted to know what smaller species i should stock and what schedule should I follow in stocking the aforementioned species? Ihope my pond will reach capacity this winter but it could take next spring's rains to top it off.. Also, should i add some sterile carp?

Thanks in advance for advice..
Posted By: Walt Foreman Re: advice on forage fish - 07/18/09 04:25 AM
What's your primary species of interest, i.e. are you most interested in LMB, or bluegill/redear? If LMB, shiners will give you bigger bass than if you didn't have them, but in my experience and observation, I've never caught bluegill as large in ponds and lakes that have GSH, as ones that don't, and I've seen in one particular instance a 100-acre lake near my hometown that used to have huge bluegill in years past, but was stocked with GSH a few years ago, and now they've overrun that large lake and the bluegill size has declined dramatically. Half of the GSH diet is crustaceans, insects, zooplankton and snails, which in other words means they're directly competing with your bluegill and redear.

FHM on the other hand are always good to stock as the sunfish and bass both will love them and they don't get large enough to avoid predation. They'll likely be little more than a distant memory within a year of stocking the bass, but in the meantime they'll give all of your fish a much better headstart than they would have had without FHM.

If bluegill and redear are your primary interests, you might want to consider stocking grass shrimp. Fattig's Fish in NE sells them, and bluegill and shellcracker both love them. They'll have a better chance of establishing a population if you have some kind of submergent weeds growing in a few places in the shallows, as weeds are their preferred habitat.

You don't need grass carp unless you don't plan to fertilize. If you fertilize the pond regularly - and in MS it probably won't take much fertilizer - you'll keep a good plankton bloom on the pond, which will make your fish grow exponentially faster, but it will also block out the sunlight from penetrating down into the water such that FA and any other weeds can't grow (except for watermeal and duckweed, and grass carp don't eat them anyway, but you probably won't get them with a new pond). Also, if you plan on feeding, which you absolutely should if big bluegill are a goal, the carp will hog the feed and make it difficult for the bluegill to get much, especially once the carp get to be thirty or forty pounds.

If bluegill and shellcracker are a priority, you might also consider stringing a few strands of fence wire a foot or two above the water in a handful of places around the pond to attract dragonflies. They lay their larvae in the water, and bluegill love said larvae and thrive on them.

Lastly, I would stock coppernose bluegill, as they grow faster and larger than normal bluegill, and tiger or F-1 bass, for the same reason. You could stock the BG/RES this fall, and the LMB next spring. The grass shrimp you could stock as soon as you can get hold of them, and the same for the FHM.
Posted By: CJBS2003 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/18/09 04:36 AM
What you stock and when you stock greatly depends on what your goals are for your pond...

Most people have goals based around three ideas:

Trophy bass

Trophy sunfish

A balanced pond with nice sized bass and sunfish, but neither getting to trophy size.

When I say trophy, I mean 10 pound bass and 2 pound sunfish...

Let us know what you're goals are and we can give you better advice. Ewest, one of the moderators lives in the same state as you and probably can give your some very first hand advice. Being in the south, and with a pond almost 2 acres in size leaves you many options!
Posted By: cougar Re: advice on forage fish - 07/18/09 11:48 AM
thanks...nice sized of both sounds good... headed on a cruise ship for a few days... will catch up with y'all if i can find internet access on board
Posted By: Ric Swaim Re: advice on forage fish - 07/18/09 12:12 PM
Just MHO. You will not gain anything stocking any predators before you're forage base is well established. It's alyways exciting to get fish in & growing but your bass will grow to a larger size if you wait at least a year after stocking forage. If you want even larger bass only stock 100 in 2 ac.
Posted By: Walt Foreman Re: advice on forage fish - 07/18/09 01:32 PM
Actually I don't know many pond managers that recommend waiting a year for bass. In the case of FHM, a year isn't going to matter; the bass will still eliminate them within a few months or less. With bluegill, they don't need a year because bass will never eliminate them and the year is not only superfluous, but they'll very likely overpopulate the pond in that time such that it will be difficult to get it righted again and could take years to do so short of Rotenone. If Cougar cared only about bass, it wouldn't matter that the bluegill were overpopulated, and it could help the bass; but since he wants good-sized fish of both, it would be highly counterproductive to wait a year to stock the bass.

Along those same lines, 100 bass is too few if he wants good-sized sunfish as they won't be enough to keep the sunfish thinned to the point that they grow to good size. 200 should be enough.
Posted By: CJBS2003 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/18/09 09:49 PM
The timing of stocking bass is highly dependent on what part of the country you are in... The far south, giving the BG a year jump start is a smart move. In the north, giving the bass a year jump start is a smart move. The bass simply gorge themselves on FHM until the BG are stocked the following year... In the middle, well I'd say stock the BG in the spring and bass in the fall.

As far as pure forage fish such as FHM, BNM, LCS, SFS, etc etc... I would put them in a year before the bass. Most people just can't wait that long though. For example, I am currently stocking a 0.4 acre pond with purely forage fish. I stocked BNM, SFS and BKF last spring, FHM, GSH, LCS and grass shrimp this spring. Next spring I will stock RES. The following spring I will finally put my predators in, SMB, YP and HSB. I hope the patience pays off and many of the forage fish sustain self reproducing populations as I will not be feeding these feed and they will rely solely on a natural food wed.
Posted By: Walt Foreman Re: advice on forage fish - 07/19/09 04:53 AM
I've never heard of any state game and fish agency, or university fisheries degree program, that recommends waiting a year from the time of stocking forage to stock bass. I just think this is an idea that doesn't play out in reality the way it sounds in theory, and is just needlessly causing pond owners to waste time with no benefit. Any forage species that can sustain LMB over a period of years in a pond, whether that species be bluegill or threadfin shad or golden shiners, does not need a head start on bass to fill a pond and keep the pond filled with all the forage a bass could ever eat; conversely, a forage species that is going to be denuded by LMB (FHM, for instance) is not going to be any less denuded by getting a head start. I'd certainly be interested to hear if any of the fisheries biologists on here disagree with me, but I've never once heard of any respected authority recommending this.

Regarding stocking bluegill in the South a year before bass: I live in the South. This is a really, really horrible idea for any pond owner that cares anything at all about catching decent-sized bluegill. TWRA stocks bluegill in the fall and bass the following spring; but they never wait longer than that to stock the bass, because bluegill stocked in the fall will most certainly spawn the following spring and again that summer, and with no predators in the pond to control the hatch, the pond would be overrun with thousands of bluegill by the time the bass were stocked. It has been noted many times by biologists that bluegill often spawn several times throughout the course of spring and summer. Even if bass in the 8-10" range were stocked at twice the normal numbers a year after the bluegill, they would not be able to get the bluegill in check; by the following spring when the then-thousands of bluegill spawned, even if their numbers had been significantly dented by the bass, the thousands of bluegill would spawn again, and at this point the pond would be overpopulated to the point that nothing would right it short of a heavy stocking of pike or muskie, or poisoning.

There's a half-acre pond near me that I have permission to fish, that the owner thought was going to be an acre but which ended up being a half-acre due to a leak. He stocked according to recommendations given him (not by me) for a bass-first pond, though he also likes to catch large bluegill; he was told to stock 1,000 bluegill, and he did. He has an automatic feeder on the pond feeding twice a day, and the pond has dozens of bass in the one- to three-pound range, and more than a few in the three- to five-pound range; a six-pounder was caught there a year ago. Despite the pond having an armada of young bass to the point that the owner asks anyone who fishes to keep all bass under two pounds, the bass have made not so much as a dent in the bluegill. And the bluegill average about four ounces, which is pretty poor for a pond on which an automatic feeder has been running for four years.

I don't think you realize how quickly bluegill can overpopulate a pond, CJ. They can do it just from a pond having a few too few bass. I fished a pond a few weeks ago that two years ago had big bluegill. At my most recent visit, I saw a handful of yearling bass swimming about, but not as many as the pond once had; by no means was the pond devoid of bass; and in two years' time, with still having a bass population, the pond has gone from big bluegill to a pond swarmed with runts, badly overpopulated. Giving bluegill a full year in a pond with no predation whatsoever is a horrible idea for anyone that cares anything at all about bluegill size, which the originator of this thread made clear he does.
Posted By: CAW25 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/19/09 05:36 AM
I respectfully disagree Walt. You need to keep in mind that most of the fisheries recommendations you find assume that the pond owners don't take an active role in fish management. They can give good advice for initial stocking numbers that will create a balanced fishery with little or no managent based on the theory that the forage will be established by the time the predators mature enough to start feeding on that forage. If it were me, I would definitely establish my forage first. If you stock FHM and let them reproduce for a year you will get a huge return on that investment. The following year I would stock 12 to 14 inch bass after the first bluegill spawn. I think you may be surprised just how much a LMB will eat when food is readily available. I don't worry so much about bluegill overpopulation. That is easily remedied with fishing. It's not very difficult to catch and remove a few hundred bluegill in a weekend if you take the time. It is something you will need to stay on top of. Take creel surveys often to determine the health of your bluegill. If they become stunted, keep harvesting. If you want some trophy bluegill, throw the biggest ones (9" or more) back and harvest the 5" to 9". Keep the small ones for the LMB. It just takes a little active participation. I think this method will definitely jump start the LMB. Don't get me started on state fish & game agencies or University programs. I'm not making a blanket statement, but I can't tell you how much bad advice of gotten from the so called experts. I can tell you without reservations that if you are looking for the best recommendations and information from people who really know their stuff, it's right here in this forum.
Posted By: CJBS2003 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/19/09 05:43 AM
Walt, first I never advised cougar to wait a year to stock the bass and second, I am well aware of the fecundity of BG and their ability to stunt rather quickly. I've been managing ponds for just a couple years and studied wildlife and fisheries science in college, so I have a slight grasp on the biology of bluegill. Sometimes personal observations are very helpful, but relying on anecdotal observations solely can lead you down the wrong path. Fisheries management is very complex!

There is no clean cut answer, but southern and northern stocking ratios and timings vary. As do the ratio and timing vary for the goal of the pond owner. Also, the size of each species stocked can play a huge role in when they are stocked. Larger bass can be stocked later than smaller bass. The same is true with BG, smaller BG may take a full year before they spawn, so waiting a YEAR may be prudent. That is why it is important to advise not only a stocking rate and timing, but also the size fish to stock. There are many variables...


Personally I think too many BG are stocked in ratio to bass more times than not and BG are given too big a jump start on the bass. Particularly those looking for a balanced pond. Many more northern pond owners look at the advice given to a southern pond owner and think that advice will work for them and it leads to problems.

In the end, the management of a BG/LMB pond is not easy particularly one that is a balance as opposed to growing trophy sunfish or bass.
Posted By: Black Bass Re: advice on forage fish - 07/19/09 05:53 AM
I believe we are arguing two different points here. I think the point CJ is trying to make is that letting FHM or BG get a few spawns in before predation will allow the forage base to maximum it's effeciency, or in other words get the most bang for your buck. You can grow ten times the number of fish you purchased to feed your predators. Thiswill grow your predators bigger and long-term save the pond owner $ that would of been spent on more forage. Keep in mind this would be a trophy predator system. IIRC in a trophy predator system you want the mean forage base size roughly 2-4" or the perfect meal for a bass.

Walt I think you are looking at the situation from the approach of a balanced fishery with diverse size distribution of each species, with a few trophies from each species. Maybe you would want your average BG a little larger say 4-6". In order to achieve this you would put LMB in sooner to start predation sooner and limit the number of BG in the pond. Which will in turn eliminate competition for resources and increase overall size distribution of the population. At the same time it will take your predators a little more work to find food and growth potential will not be maximized like it would in CJ's "Trophy Bass" model. IMO this situation should be more sustainable long term as it is a more natural environment for the fish.

I do think you both can agree that anyway you slice it FHM will not survive long term in a BG/LMB pond.

There are many management options available to the pondmeister. It is important that we know what our goals are for our fishery from day one as each action we take during our management will have long term effects. Thats why I am so glad I found this website and the magazine, too bad it was after I put it in 25 CC that I really dont want to feed. They are also taking up valuable predator biomass and will eventually have to be fished out (if possible). What a great investment???


Posted By: CJBS2003 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/19/09 06:01 AM
 Originally Posted By: CAW25
You need to keep in mind that most of the fisheries recommendations you find assume that the pond owners don't take an active role in fish management.


BINGO! We have a winner... Most state agencies or universities assume the pond owner/manager will not be putting time in to manage their pond. So perhaps another question that should be asked when a person is looking for advise, is: Are you willing to invest time into the management of your pond? If they aren't stocking reccomendations may be very different!
Posted By: Black Bass Re: advice on forage fish - 07/19/09 06:12 AM
 Originally Posted By: CJBS2003
 Originally Posted By: CAW25
You need to keep in mind that most of the fisheries recommendations you find assume that the pond owners don't take an active role in fish management.


BINGO! We have a winner... Most state agencies or universities assume the pond owner/manager will not be putting time in to manage their pond. So perhaps another question that should be asked when a person is looking for advise, is: Are you willing to invest time into the management of your pond? If they aren't stocking reccomendations may be very different!


Yeah that's what I meant above about "IMO this situation should be more sustainable long term as it is a more natural environment for the fish".
Posted By: CAW25 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/19/09 06:20 AM
I agree with CJB, there is no clear cut answer. It takes active management to reach your goals. Harvesting plays an import part. Walt mention a pond owner who had been using automatic feeders for 4 years and the bluegill were still stunted. The landowner asked people to remove all LMB they caught under 2 lbs. Why would you harvest the bass and not the bluegill? Seems to me someone needed to remove a few hundred bluegill or more. You can't grow trophys without harvesting. You can't have a balanced pond without harvesting for that matter. Harvesting is the best tool we have in managing an established pond. All the examples Walt mentioned didn't include harvesting bluegill. If the bass aren't "making a dent in the bluegill population" I would suggest the pond owner making a dent or even a great big hole if necessary. Isn't fishing the reason most of us got into this in the first place? Go out and catch em. Take an active role in management. I'm sure that stocking predators and forage at the same time or building the forage first and stocking the predators later will both work if MANAGED properly. I'm sure that the are many in this forum who will swear by both methods. Pond Meistering is a full contact sport. You've got to go out and get your hands dirty. Don't sit around and wait for the bass to do your job. Don't let your BG get out of hand. Be active.
Posted By: CJBS2003 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/19/09 06:33 AM
 Originally Posted By: Black Bass
I think the point CJ is trying to make is that letting FHM or BG get a few spawns in before predation will allow the forage base to maximum it's effeciency, or in other words get the most bang for your buck.


Close to what I was saying... FHM, BNM, LCS, BKF and other species of SOLELY forage fish should be given a substantial jump start on the stocking of bass. At least a year... BG, YP and others, that is highly dependable, many times I would say stock them after the bass but in a size too large for the current bass to eat for a balanced fishery.

 Originally Posted By: Black Bass
I do think you both can agree that anyway you slice it FHM will not survive long term in a BG/LMB pond.


I agree, FHM don't have a shot in establishing an extended self reproducing population. However, if the correct habitat is there, BNM, LCS and BKF certainly can. However, they need time to build their numbers before the introduction of bass unless you stock extremely large numbers of them which is not possible for the average pondmeister's bank account or ability to catch and prepare large numbers of those species from wild sources. Perhaps the only species I wouldn't put in this category are GSH. With them I would just stock larger adults when I stocked the fingerling bass to reduce the risk of them overpopulating and overly competing with the sunfish.

In a balanced fishery, the stocking of 2"-3" BG in the fall followed by the stocking of 2"-3" LMB in the spring would lead to a healthy balance under most conditions. The idea is that the bass are not big enough to eat the original stocked BG but are big enough to immediately and efficiently prey on their offspring. However, southern states with their longer growing season may require the building of the BG population for a year before the bass are stocked. This is the big difference between northern and southern ponds, the length of the growing season! Even if the goal is a balanced fishery, southern ponds may need this building period. The reason, a longer growing season means bass are feeding at the warm weather higher metabolism rate for more of the year. This means the bass will consume more BG in a southern pond than a northern pond. THIS is the reason that a southern pond may need a building year prior to bass stocking, even if a balanced pond is the goal.

 Originally Posted By: Black Bass
Maybe you would want your average BG a little larger say 4-6". In order to achieve this you would put LMB in sooner to start predation sooner and limit the number of BG in the pond. Which will in turn eliminate competition for resources and increase overall size distribution of the population.


This is where size of fish stocked along with timing can really change the dynamics. Size of fish stocked along with numbers is just as important as the timing of the stocking.

 Originally Posted By: Black Bass
There are many management options available to the pondmeister. It is important that we know what our goals are for our fishery from day one as each action we take during our management will have long term effects.


VERY TRUE... We must also remember that even with a well laid out stocking plan, each pond is different and management of ponds is ongoing. This is so we can tweak things to keep them progressing towards our goals.
Posted By: Dave Davidson1 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/19/09 11:03 AM
I often recommend waiting a year to stock bass. Of course, this assumes that you aren't going to stock fingerling bass.
Posted By: Walt Foreman Re: advice on forage fish - 07/19/09 08:02 PM
A few basic points:

CAW25: I am not an amateur who comes on here to learn the basics, and then decides to throw around advice. If you take me as that, you are very mistaken. I currently manage several ponds professionally, and I have ten years of experience doing so, so my knowledge is not theory, it's firsthand, proven experience. I don't recommend anything unless I know it works. If you have experience managing ponds professionally that eclipses mine, by all means continue discounting my scientifically-proven, widely-accepted and recommended advice.

Regarding the pretty silly idea that game and fish agencies assume pond owners are not going to take an active role in managing their ponds: maybe your state DNR is that haphazard, but mine certainly isn't. All of TWRA's recommendations - which were one of my first sources of information on managing ponds - are based on pond owners who take a very active, sustained role in the management of their ponds, in everything from pH to fertility to pond construction to regular harvesting. I would go way out on a limb here and suggest that there are many other state game and fish agencies in addition to TN's that are actually staffed by degreed fisheries biologists who have a great deal of both academic and real-world, field experience behind their recommendations, and further that they make said recommendations not as a shoddy compromise from the ideal pond, but rather in an earnest - and very informed - effort to help pond owners achieve the best fishing possible in their ponds. Furthermore, I stated not only that I had never heard a state agency make the recommendation to wait a year from the time of stocking bluegill to the time of stocking bass, but I've never heard a fisheries biologist or professional pond manager make that recommendation either, and so far, since I posted, none on this forum have spoken up and said they would recommend it. That should tell you something.

Lastly, and I would think this would have been the most obvious of all but perhaps it is not, my recommendation was based on actually listening to cougar's specific goals, which obviously none of you have done. He clearly stated very early in this thread, when asked which species was his priority, that he would like to have nice-sized members of both. It's very dubious, and completely unproven scientifically, whether any benefit derives to a pond managed solely for trophy bass when said pond is stocked with bass a year after forage is stocked, for the reasons I already delineated and won't do again; it's clearly and scientifically, empirically demonstrable that waiting a year from the time of stocking bluegill (which are bass forage) to the time of stocking bass, in the South, will yield exactly the opposite results from what cougar is seeking. My observations are not "anecdotal," they are scientifically proven and I only cited specific examples in a (wasted) attempt to educate. The half-acre pond I cited has had a large number of bluegill removed just this year, many of them by me; the pond that I mentioned that used to have big bluegill, has had several bluegill harvested in years past, though when the bluegill were at their biggest the pond had not been fished in some time. Here again, though, having personally corrected several ponds that at some point were overrun with tiny bluegill, I think I'm safe in saying that the other posters to this thread really know not of what they speak. It's not a situation that is remedied overnight, which is why many biologists recommend Rotenone in such a situation. I was merely trying to point out the tremendous stupidity that would inhere in cougar having to face that situation because he got bad advice on the forum he went to seeking expert advice. And it's more than a little frustrating to have significant professional experience, and offer scientifically-proven, sound, widely-recommended advice, and have it discounted by posters who have little to no experience.

Don't take this the wrong way, CJ, as I have nothing against you personally. But two years of experience working with ponds is almost equivalent to none; you haven't had time yet to really see the long-term effects of any management strategy you may have employed to this point. You may have some great ponds; they didn't get that way in two years.
Posted By: davatsa Re: advice on forage fish - 07/19/09 08:10 PM
 Originally Posted By: Walt Foreman

CAW25: I am not an amateur who comes on here to learn the basics, and then decides to throw around advice. If you take me as that, you are very mistaken. I currently manage several ponds professionally, and I have ten years of experience doing so, so my knowledge is not theory, it's firsthand, proven experience. I don't recommend anything unless I know it works. If you have experience managing ponds professionally that eclipses mine, by all means continue discounting my scientifically-proven, widely-accepted and recommended advice.




Walt,

Most of us are amateurs, not professionals. Your credentials are undoubtedly impressive.

The point of this forum, however, is for all of us to get together and collaborate. I think your above post, unfortunately, will discourage all of us admitted amateurs from speaking our minds.

You might be spot on with all of your analyses on this forum, but there is nothing wrong with someone else approaching the same problem from a different angle. Disparaging the experiences of others will not help Pond Boss achieve the free flow of ideas. Your opinions are worthy, but they're not the only viable information on this forum.
Posted By: Walt Foreman Re: advice on forage fish - 07/19/09 08:34 PM
I never meant to discourage amateurs - far from it. I just haven't seen any of the biologists or other professional pond managers on here have their recommendations discredited as though they knew nothing of what they spoke. It's happened several times to me recently on here, often by one poster, and it gets to be a little frustrating. I'm all for the free exchange of ideas; it just seems to me that someone with very limited experience might take into consideration the greater experience of someone else before poo-pooing his advice to posters.

It's not a different angle to state that what I just recommended doesn't work and is a bad idea. That's discounting not only my advice, but my legitimacy and ability as a pond manager.

I won't pretend to be the most knowledgeable person on here; there are some pretty smart and pretty experienced biologists and pond managers on here, and I learn from them daily. But I have managed to learn a good deal from my years of managing ponds. I don't get anything out of answering a new member's query for help other than the satisfaction of knowing I may have helped someone to have a better pond. If Bob Lusk had the time to answer every single query, there would be no need for the rest of us because it's doubtful any of us would often be able to offer better advice than he could; but that's why he made this forum, so people with lots of experience can help those with less. I don't have a degree in fisheries science, and am already self-conscious about that, as I have two master's degrees in other fields; I found this site only a few months ago, and have enjoyed both learning and being able to educate. But it's more than a little maddening to have to stop myself every time I consider answering a new member's question, and wonder whether my advice is going to be dismissed out-of-hand even if I have firsthand experience with the situation and the person dismissing does not.
Posted By: Ric Swaim Re: advice on forage fish - 07/19/09 09:40 PM
 Quote:
But it's more than a little maddening to have to stop myself every time I consider answering a new member's question, and wonder whether my advice is going to be dismissed out-of-hand even if I have firsthand experience with the situation and the person dismissing does not.

You should give your advise freely. As everyone else does without reguard whether or not it is taken & applied. It's the combo of all advise/experience shared that is the value of this forum.
If you get mad when the girl you give flowers to rejects them, you'll stand not a chance. Give it your best shot & let it go.
Posted By: CJBS2003 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/19/09 10:15 PM
 Originally Posted By: Walt Foreman
Don't take this the wrong way, CJ, as I have nothing against you personally. But two years of experience working with ponds is almost equivalent to none; you haven't had time yet to really see the long-term effects of any management strategy you may have employed to this point. You may have some great ponds; they didn't get that way in two years.


I guess sarcasm doesn't come through on a computer very well... I've been dealing with ponds for just a hair more than two years.

And Walt, it's nothing personal either... Don't take it that way. I just like you am gaining nothing from this forum. I don't sell fish, I don't sell pond management products and I don't have plans on becoming a fisheries biologist. So I like you give advice based on the 17 years I have managed ponds for friends, family and myself along with the knowledge I gained while studying wildlife and fisheries science in college.

Again, pond management is extremely variable what your experiences may have been can often be very different from what my experiences or another member's experiences are. So we post what WE think would be the best methods to attain results. If they are different from other posters whether they be fisheries pros or amateurs is irrelevant. It is, in the end up to the person seeking advice to sort through the information given and decide how they want to manage their pond.
Posted By: ewest Re: advice on forage fish - 07/19/09 10:24 PM
Lets start with this :

Bob Lusk
Lunker


Welcome to the Pond Boss Forum. This is the place for sharing information about the enjoyment of private ponds in a fun, family like atmosphere.

All posts and discussions should be done as if you were talking to family or friends. Any post that appears to the management to be not in keeping with its standards will be be deleted and the maker banned from the Forum. This includes any post that could be seen as mean spirited or offensive and/or directed toward any individual(s) or any post with dirty words, or containing comments of a sexual, religious, racial or political nature or not deemed to be in "good taste". The use of any personal contact information such as E-mail address(s) or use of Private Messages must follow the same standards.

If you wouldn't say it to your Mother, don't say it to us.





Next some things to keep in mind.

No one has all the answers.

Every pond is different.

State level Mgt agencies provide info on the beginners level as that is their charge because most ponds are not managed by biologists but by people who need to keep it simple. They generally do not give cutting advice because it carries to much risk for the average pond owner. Many of their mgt books are written on tried and true 1940s basic mgt principals - which were written for food production not recreation as the primary goal.

If you will notice the real experts on here rarely say things like "do only this , this and that" because they know what I said first above - that there are few absolutes in pond mgt



Surveys of state level stocking reccommendetations clearly show great differences and variety but each is basic. They are vastly different on some subjects.

Every one in this discussion has some good points and some not so correct. That is ok so long as you state your point and don't direct comments to other individuals. It is not a good idea to tell someone they are wrong or crazy. Thank each of you for sharing time and effort here. I encourage everyone to keep an open mind and strive to learn as much as you can.
Posted By: CJBS2003 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/19/09 10:30 PM
Thank you Eric, if my posts came off as personal attacks they weren't intended that way. Sometimes the exchange of ideas, even among friends can be a bit boisterous. I am sure Walt would say the same thing.
Posted By: ewest Re: advice on forage fish - 07/19/09 10:42 PM
CJ you and Walt are both valued members of this Forum. You both have a wealth of good info to share and help to give others. Differences of opinion are ok as they cause all of us to challenge our on beliefs and search for answers - that is how one grows. It is good for readers to see several opinions and then make up their on mind or seek more help.

Keep Bob's rules in mind when posting . Thank you guys for your participation.
Posted By: CAW25 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/20/09 04:05 AM
Ouch! Where do I begin? Who discounted out of hand everything you said? There's more than one way to skin a cat. I happen to prefer to build my forage first and stock the predators later but both methods will work (I thought I mentioned that.) My main point, which I mentioned several times, is management. I don't care which method you choose it still takes management. Be active.

As far as my "pretty silly idea that fish and game agencies assume pond owners won't take an active role in fish management" I refer you to the State of Ohio pond management guide. They basically tell you to stock bluegill and bass in the typical numbers per acre .......and then don't touch it for at least 4 years so as not to offset the balance. I guess you could call that passive management. They also so you can add CC at rates of 100 per acre as a "bonus" fish since they won't compete with the LMB and bluegill. I guess they eat water. The fish farm I bought my fish from (which is ran buy a degreed fisheries biologist) insisted on stocking hybrid bluegills only so I don't overpopulate. I sincerely thank him and his pet green sunfish. A local DNR guy told me not to worry about Rusty crayfish. It seems they "are just better at being a crawdad than other types". His exact words. Sure the bass eat them as well as they do other types. He forget to mention that they will eat every plant in your pond. If I could train them to eat my lawn I would be OK with it. I guess my point is that bad information comes from many sources, including those with nice peices of paper hanging on their walls, which I have (big deal).

Republican or democrat, Catholic or Protestant, stocking predators initially or stocking after the forage is established, I'm sure both sides have more common ground than disagreements. Isn't discussions like this what this forum is about? No need to get personal. Nobody is questioning your knowledge or experience. If anyone was "dismissing out of hand" what was being said....Que the disclaimer EWEST.....look in the mirror.
Posted By: Dave Davidson1 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/20/09 11:59 AM
Ya know, we have an odd situation here in Texas. Bluegills don't get much of a chance to stunt where bass are present. Some of us are even stocking 2,000 BG/RES per acre and waiting a year to stock predators. Then, after two years, cull bass like crazy. Then, we often supplementally stock tilapia to take pressure off bluegills.

That might not work in other places but bass heavy/bluegill light seems to be the norm for light or moderately managed ponds here. Some writers say that 500 BG per acre is plenty and I agree as long as your game plan gives them plenty of time to load up the pond with bass groceries.

That's why I always tell pond owners to stock bass when they can go to sleep with their mouth open and wake up with a full belly. The State Biologists that I know agree with me.
Posted By: Walt Foreman Re: advice on forage fish - 07/20/09 03:12 PM
Here again, the pond owner said he's interested in catching good-sized specimens of both species. Stocking 2,000 bluegill per acre is a recommendation solely geared for big bass. Not the poster's goal. That stocking would produce a result very counter to his goal.
Posted By: jimmydee Re: advice on forage fish - 07/20/09 03:42 PM
Dave, I agreee completely. I stocked my one old pond last year with 250 3-5"BG, 150 2' RES, and about 75 RES from 7-12" from another lake. I loaded it up with 10 lb of FHM, then this spring another 10 lb. YESTERDAY, I put in 10 LMB from another lake that were from 9-12" long. They should have PLENTY to eat along with thousands of tadpoles and small frogs in my pond.

This fall, I'll get another 10-15 LMB in the 10-12" category and see what the spring brings. I also did something I said I wouldn't do. BUT, I put in 5 crappie (all five were males). If I keep adding crappie a couple at a time till I get about 50 in there and their all males, I should be able to catch some decent crappie in a couple years.

Did I make a mistake???
Posted By: david u Re: advice on forage fish - 07/20/09 03:48 PM
Good info here...I'm in the same boat(pun) as Cougar and have decided to stock predators(6-8" LMB & HSB) this fall after stocking 2-6" CNBG & FHM this May rather than wait till next Spring. But it is nice to know those on this forums' opinion either way and value the spirited rhetoric..wonder how Cougar's cruise is going?? du
Posted By: Dave Davidson1 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/20/09 04:03 PM
 Originally Posted By: Walt Foreman
Here again, the pond owner said he's interested in catching good-sized specimens of both species. Stocking 2,000 bluegill per acre is a recommendation solely geared for big bass. Not the poster's goal. That stocking would produce a result very counter to his goal.


I don't necessarily think so Walt. A good number of the BG will attain trophy size. BTW, I consider a 9" BG a trophy. Others may not.

Lots of people think that big BG and big bass are mutually exclusive. I don't.
Posted By: Dave Davidson1 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/20/09 04:05 PM
David, how in the dickens are you sexing those crappie? I've never messed with them and know nothing about crappie. Heck, I don't even know how to catch them at this time of year.
Posted By: david u Re: advice on forage fish - 07/20/09 05:11 PM
DD1, jimmydee did the Crappie thing..not me.
Posted By: Walt Foreman Re: advice on forage fish - 07/20/09 05:24 PM
9" bluegill is not a trophy to me; I caught several that size a few days ago at a pond I just started managing again after being in CA for ten years; I've only been working with the pond two months, and the bluegill are a little larger than they were when I started, but I was not happy with not catching any bluegill over 10", which I regularly did when I last worked with that pond, and for that matter any pond I had worked with for more than two years. It's possible your 9" bluegill weighs more than my nine-inchers at the moment, as the pond I mentioned isn't fed.

A decent-sized bluegill can still happen every now and then in a pond that's overcrowded with bluegill. Certainly the bass will get larger in such a pond, but my point was, Cougar clearly stated he would like good-sized individuals of both, which would seem to me to indicate a lack of focus on bass, and more of a desire for a balanced pond, which will still yield trophy-sized LMB and BG both, which a bluegill-crowded pond will not. It's very simple population dynamics.
Posted By: jimmydee Re: advice on forage fish - 07/20/09 06:23 PM
Walt, OK, then, with a 3/4 A pond stocked last year with 250 3-5" BG, and 150 1"RES, and about 75 adult RES, produce a balanced BG/LMB polulation if I just presented the pond with 10 9-12" LMB and will add 15 more of the same siz throughout the summer and fall? What is your take on that scenario?

I guess, after reading what you just posted above, I'm concerned with an over population of BG.
Posted By: jimmydee Re: advice on forage fish - 07/20/09 06:55 PM
Dave, my sexing of the crapie is/was a best guess. None had the typical distended bellie that you can 'sometimes' see in a female, and they all had the typical blackness in stripes tat 'usually' are indicative of males. Again, a guess at best, bu at least a somewhat educated guess. Gosh, I hope I was right.

I don't think that eventually 10-15 crappie, even if a 5-6 are female will overbalance my pond.

Your thoughts?
Posted By: Theo Gallus Re: advice on forage fish - 07/20/09 07:31 PM
It only takes two to tango.
Posted By: jimmydee Re: advice on forage fish - 07/20/09 07:45 PM
Yeah, but it takes four to square dance.

So, did I really mess up, or will my LMB keep things under control???
Posted By: Dave Davidson1 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/20/09 08:02 PM
Jimmy, only time will tell.
Posted By: Dave Davidson1 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/20/09 08:26 PM
Walt, in my own personal pond, I don't feed except when I show up. I regularly catch 9 inch BG and sometimes some a little bigger. But, not much bigger. It seems these days that I don't get to show up near often enough. We made the 140 mile round trip drive yesterday just to feed fish.

However, following the 2,000 BG recipe with bass added a year later, ponds that I semi manage for other people have gotten some pretty stunning results before the bass are added. Those that get a jump start, and some always do, keep growing. As they feed on the abundant fry, the protein keeps coming. However, if someone wanted only a big BG pond, I wouldn't recommend over 500 per acre with 2 feeders. Then, I would stock bass soon after depending on the weather(heat). Also, for trophy BG, I don't believe in eating the big ones.

The reality is that it is double tough to have both trophy BG and trophy bass in the same pond. It can be done but it takes more intense management and the stars all have to line up just right. Oh yeah, we also have to pray real hard for rain. I had it all done right in one 3 acre pond. Then the guys wife heard about the benefits of fertilization. In North Central Texas we don't need to fertilize. Within a week he had floaters everywhere. I waded out wearing white sneakers and they disappeared just above my ankles. That was in August a year ago. The guy told me that he knew he should have called me first. Instead of crying, we sat down and had a beer.
Posted By: Sunil Re: advice on forage fish - 07/20/09 08:44 PM
"I waded out wearing white sneakers..."

This is just wrong in so many ways.

Why didn't you just take your shoes off?
Posted By: Theo Gallus Re: advice on forage fish - 07/20/09 09:03 PM
 Originally Posted By: Sunil
"I waded out wearing white sneakers..."

This is just wrong in so many ways.


1) Give him a break, he took his kickers off.

2) White sneakers are the preferred visibility gauge in Hurst & Bowie. That way they don't have to try and pronounce "Secchi."

3) His red sneakers were in the laundry.
Posted By: Greg Grimes Re: advice on forage fish - 07/20/09 09:24 PM
jimd do you want good bass growth and/or nice size bg/res? You will get good bass growth on the 10 you put in. I would not recommend too many more adult size bass right now. This is in fear the bass will eat up the bluegill and res too soon since just put in last year. All this advice is if you want balanced/quality bass. If wanting monster bluegill put in those bass and more. I think it is easy to correct bluegill issues but again I'm talking SE.
Posted By: Ric Swaim Re: advice on forage fish - 07/20/09 11:46 PM
I think DD1 like me is old enough to have grown up barefoot with soles tougher than shoe leather. But now like me can barely stand walking on hardwood floors barefoot .. esp. when they're soft from soaking in water.
Posted By: Sunil Re: advice on forage fish - 07/21/09 01:19 AM
Dang Ric, you had to go get all serious on us. Now it's going to be harder to tee-off on the Guvnor.

I can just picture Guv in some brand new white tennis shoes....."You had a fish kill?......Awwwww, I'll just wade in there and see what I can dredge up."

This does remind me of young Condello with the 5-day dead carp. Anyone still have that photo?
Posted By: Ric Swaim Re: advice on forage fish - 07/21/09 01:56 AM
Didn't know I was serious, course I was saying that right up till I said "I DO" too.
Sometimes it's several days later before I pick up on someone dissing me too;-)
Posted By: Walt Foreman Re: advice on forage fish - 07/21/09 03:17 AM
Jimmydee, the good news is you started with very reasonable stocking numbers for bluegill and redear. What concerns me, if you care about bluegill size which it sounds like you do, is 1) that you didn't stock bass until a year after the bluegill, and 2) you only added ten bass.

The prevailing wisdom in Northern states, which MO comes closer to being than Southern since you get snow every year and probably see your ponds freeze over, is that bass should be stocked up to a year BEFORE the bluegill, to give the bass time to get large enough to prey on bluegill by the time the bluegill are added. It's been documented that overpopulation by bluegill is a bigger problem up North than in the South (and it's a huge problem even here), and while you're not quite in MN, you're still closer to being Northern than Southern, by a good bit. And, since you stocked 3-5" bluegill rather than fingerlings, it's about a 100% bet that your bluegill spawned this year, probably two or three times over the course of the summer. Ten bass have no chance whatsoever at controlling the bluegill that are already in your pond, and when next spring gets here you could really be in bad shape.

I will qualify this by saying that, if you only care about bass, those ten bass are loving life right now, and will get very large. But there's a very decent chance that unless you stocked them very early this year and they got in a successful spawn, that by next spring when they try to spawn there will be such a multitude of bluegill raiding their nests for the eggs and then any fry that manage to hatch, that no bass from that spawn will survive, and that the scenario will repeat the following spring and the one after that and the one after that (but worsening as the bluegill get more and more out of hand), until those ten bass die and your pond has no bass. If I had a dollar for every time I've seen a pond completely stuffed with tiny, horribly stunted bluegill and not a LMB left in it, I'd have a bunch of dollars. I'm working right now with just such a pond.

So now that I've forecast gloom and doom, I'll qualify it by saying, I haven't seen your pond. I could fish it for an hour and tell you whether it's balanced or overpopulated, and if so, how badly it's overpopulated; not being there, I would suggest either just to fish it yourself, if you're a pretty good angler, or barring that, either go all-out and hire a reputable pond manager like Shawn to electrofish it, or if you're on a budget just invite someone you know who has a reputation for being an exceptional angler to fish it for an hour or two. They might do it for free, or barring that, maybe a beer or two, $50, whatever. You can tell pretty well whether the bluegill are overpopulated just from four or five bluegill. If the first four bluegill caught average 4" or less and are skinny, they're probably overpopulated; if they have heads that seem too large for their bodies and average 3" or less, they're definitely overpopulated; if they average 6" or better (for your pond, one year old) and are fat with heads that don't seem large for their bodies, or if there is a wide range of sizes with some large ones and some small ones that still seem pretty healthy, the pond is in good shape right now. Don't quote me on these sizes as this is just me trying to explain to you via typing what is much easier to determine in person actually looking at the fish.

If you want big bluegill, you most definitely should add more bass, yesterday. I would add 40 or 50 8-10" right away. If you want both big bluegill and big bass you still should add at least 25. The key if you want big fish of both species will be very careful, documented harvesting on a yearly schedule of both species such that your total biomass stays well below the maximum capacity of the pond.
Posted By: Dave Davidson1 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/21/09 11:26 AM
According to my old squaw, I never throw anything away and am sometimes careless about my appearance. Those white shoes had been laying around in the back of my pickup for some time. It could be that his visibility was a little bit better due to the slightly faded condition of the shoes.

Walt, my experience is only in Texas and we just don't have much of a problem (never seen one) with stunted BG's. With bass, they don't get a chance to stunt and we soon have stunted bass due to the abundance of food and overeating it. If there are no bass, a DO crash usually corrects the overpopulation problems in smaller ponds. I get one every year on a small forage pond and it is about due.

I have heard about the stocking of bass a year before stocking BG but never done it. What kind of forage do you stock with the bass?


Posted By: CJBS2003 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/21/09 12:18 PM
In a typical northern pond where a balance is the goal would involve stocking FHM a year before any other fish. Allow the FHM to explode in the pond so they are thick. Then it varies with the sizes of the fish. In northern ponds the idea is simple. Stock the bass first and allow them to gorge themselves on FHM for a year so they can put on size. The further north you go, you may even want to give them two full years of growth or at least stock advanced fingerlings. You want your bass to just be small enough to not be able to eat the original BG you stock. So say you are stocking 3"-4" BG, you'd want 8" or so LMB at that time. If you are stocking 2"-3" BG you'd want 4"-5" LMB. Knowing bass up north grow slower, you just want to make sure they are big enough to keep up with all the BG spawns. The bass will not reach trophy size, but will do well. The BG won't hit trophy size, but will do well. A good balance number is 5 to 1, and I am even a fan of 3 to 1 particularly if GSH are also stocked, BG to LMB.

I agree with what Mark Cornwell says in an article he wrote originally printed in Pond Boss. In it, he says this about growing nice sized bass in a northern ponds reference what to stock:

 Originally Posted By: http://www.bassresource.com
Starting Your Baitfish Cocktail
By Mark Cornwell

Every year I get plenty of calls from brand new pond owners asking similar questions. You may have asked the same question. "I just built a new pond, what should I stock for baitfish?" Answers depend on how and for what you want to manage your pond. Just about every one of these proud new pond owners ultimately want bass. And, more likely than not, most folks are in a hurry to get bass started.
Here is the first advice I give them ... Be patient!
In northern ponds the best bet for bass forage is to stock a cocktail of fathead minnows, golden shiners, crayfish and in some circumstances, bluegill.
Wait at least a full year before stocking any bass, largemouth or smallmouth. For the first year consider your bass pond a bait pond. Manage it for baitfish. This might mean fertilizing to promote a plankton bloom to assist survival and growth of thousands of young fish. It might mean supplemental feeding to speed the growth process a bit. Baitfish production in the first years can spell success of a northern bass pond. Lack of baitfish spells small, stunted, slow growing bass.
In the spring of the year after new pond construction is complete and there is plenty of water, stock with fathead minnows, golden shiners and local species of crayfish which like muddy pond bottoms.
Fatheads are prolific, often spawning multiple times during warmer months. Spawning begins about 60- 65�F and ends at 80�F. Females deposit eggs on undersides of firm objects such as flat rocks, wood, lilies, tires, pallets and similar substrate. You need firm, solid substrate in shallow water. Having solid spawning habitat is essential to breeding success. Some enterprising pondmeisters make removable structures by tossing in wooden freight pallets with ropes attached. When spawning activity stops, remove the pallets and store for next year. Don't remove structure too early though, there may be eggs attached.
Males build nests and help attach sticky fertile eggs to the clean, round spot of choice. A fathead minnow nest is about as big as a silver dollar and tiny egg masses have a grayish color tint. The male guards the nest until hatching, and then scrapes the nest clean for the next batch.
Fatheads cultured in an extensive (no feeding) situation can produce hundreds of pounds of minnows in a year, starting with just 5 pounds per acre in the spring. When stocking broodfish fatheads, the tendency is to stock the largest breeders you can find. This may not be the best strategy since males are usually larger than females and best results are achieved when you stock four or five females to every male. Buying fatheads 'pond run' makes the most sense. In breeding season, males have a dark head and spikes, called tubercles, on their heads. These bumps are used to make and guard the nest. Since males spend their entire time making and guarding nests, mortality of the biggest, oldest, male brood fish is high after spawning; consequently the recommendation to stock younger, smaller fish along with large ones, for replacement. 'Pond run' stocking helps keep the reproductive effort at full throttle throughout late spring and all summer. Fathead minnows reach maturity before age one and rarely live more than 18 months. Fatheads are a nice choice because they eat a wide range of foods including algae, insect larvae, zooplankton and dead organic material (detritus). The latter is important because fatheads continue to forage when one or more food items is gone. Detritus is available for food in nearly all pond circumstances, even new ponds. Fatheads commonly forage in near-shore shallow water. They can be purchased from bait wholesalers dirt cheap. I have recently seen them sold in the North in the range of $2.50-$10 per pound. Fathead minnows won't break the bank.
Hold the bass. Still, be patient.
In most northern ponds or small lakes the next thing to consider stocking is golden shiners. Golden shiners are intermittent spawners, which mean they can spawn throughout the northern summer from May to August when water temperatures climb above 68�F. In the South this season may be extended from March to October. But, when water temperatures rise much above 80 degrees, spawning stops. Golden shiners broadcast their eggs over vegetation or filamentous algae. If your new pond lacks submerged vegetation or filamentous algae, use mats of straw or hay and place in shallow areas peripherally (Forney, 1958). In the North, shiners mature at age two, but in the South time to maturity has reportedly been as short as 7-8 months. Ponds stocked with 20 or so pounds of brood shiners can produce 100-200 pounds or more of baby shiners in a year. Shiners will forage in open waters of the pond, cropping off insect larvae, zooplankton, some filamentous algae and occasionally other fish larvae. They have been known to be predatory, limited only by their small mouth size. When stocking, buy shiners which are 2-3 years old or 4-6" in length. These are your "golden cows" and will often live to 7-9 years of age. Both golden shiners and fathead minnows should be stocked by May 1st in northern ponds, earlier in the South. Don't stock those bass yet.
Next up, stock crayfish. You can put these clawed creatures in your pond when stocking fatheads and shiners ... or stock in the fall months before. There are many species of crayfish and are hard to tell apart. Acquire crayfish stock from a reputable dealer who tells you they have come from a mud-bottom pond. In the North this usually means stocking paper shell crayfish or "grass crabs" as they are sometimes called by bait dealers. In New York and other northern areas, paper shell crayfish are probably the best species of crayfish to stock for pond culture. Paper shell crayfish are the only species of recommended by the Cornell Cooperative Extension (Forney, 1958) for pond culture. If you wait until spring to stock them make sure that the females are "berried" or have eggs under their tails. Crayfish should be stocked at 500-1000 per acre and by August of the first summer you should have thousands of 2.5" crayfish that will be future fish food. These young will stay in their burrows during the day and may not be evident milling around the pond. In the North these crayfish burrow into the mud in the late fall and winter months. Increased yield of crayfish and other shore loving bait can be increased by shoreline scalloping by increasing the amount of habitat for these critters to live and eat.
No! Not yet! Please, no bass.
But Mark! My pond is a BASS POND! No it isn't. It will be. The first three years it is focused as a BAIT POND. I would not stock a single bass until the pond has gone through one full year of bait production and for the first three years bait should dominate, not bass.
Before we get to bluegill let's talk about what is supposed to happen with the first mix of fish. In the first year of the pond, fatheads rule. They will go crazy and produce mucho pounds of bait. If the correct conditions exist (food and structure) they will dominate the pond and be visible everywhere. Meanwhile the "golden cow" shiners will be producing crops of their own and getting bigger. We want these golden shiners big. Fatheads are happily foraging along shore; shiners are foraging out in the open water. Crayfish are eating and breeding along the bottom and burrowing in when times get tough. No bass. No one is getting eaten. A northern pond baitfish Mecca.
Now, drum roll please... the bass! If you have excellent willpower you may want to let the baitfish cruise through two full growing seasons before stocking bass. Most pond owners I know can barely wait through one season. So, if you must, stock small (4-6') bass. Why so small? The small bass will hone in on those fatheads and pound the heck out of them. While the bass are growing bigger by eating fathead's near shore, your golden shiners are slipping under their radar and producing plenty of young. The original year class and as many as two additional year classes of golden shiners will get through mild bass predation because they will start out too big for small bass to eat. Several years of additional production will come from these "golden cow" shiners. While this is happening, paper shell crayfish are also flying under the radar.
But sadly, (and expectedly) the minnow banquet ends. I give this cocktail a life span of about 5-10 year's post-bass stocking. In most ponds you'll be hard pressed to find a single fathead minnow 3 years after stocking bass. A pond loaded with enough fatheads to walk across will be eaten down to none and recruitment of young shiners to spawning size will eventually be cut off by bass predation. Some paper shells will make it and may even persist despite being targeted by the bass. However, great bass growth is most often driven by them eating other fish so you will miss those minnows! But during those years the bass in your pond should have excellent growth. Eventually, the unfortunate conclusion is bass eating bass. Bass are pigs. Not happy with this scenario?
To bluegill or not to bluegill? That is the question. I know, I know. I have studied tried and true methods of stocking bass/bluegill ponds, and in the south, bluegill rules. But, that's not necessarily the case north of the Mason-Dixon line. If you stock bluegill you may want to do it at the same time you stock bass. My experiences with bluegill are mostly bad. They often overpopulate small ponds and stunt, while raising problems with bass reproduction. Bluegill often mob and rob bass nests and cause bass to have low reproductive success. See, in northern ponds bass growth very slow. A 14 inch largemouth bass may be five or six years old. So, the dynamics between bluegill and bass are very different. If you stock bluegill, you should fish the heck out of them as they mature. In small northern ponds this means removing 4-5 pounds of bluegill for every pound of bass. Few people, including me, have that kind of patience. However, they do offer increased angling opportunity, especially for kids. This should enter into your thinking. As an aside, you may design your pond with steep sides where bluegill will find the habitat inhospitable for spawning.
So then, what is a pond owner to do? Are you doomed to have a bass pond where bass are eating just bass? No and Yes, depending on your situation. No, if you have a larger body of water (like a small lake) where yellow perch or another fish can ultimately buffer some of the bass predation and the lake may have areas where forage can find refuge from bass. There are some excellent bass, perch, bluegill and golden shiner lakes that are 15-100 acres. Yes, you may be doomed to bass on bass if you have a small pond with little habitat diversity. Cheer up! I have seen some really nice bass on bass ponds, with some surprisingly large bass in them. What will slow down the progression toward an all bass pond? Maybe smallmouth bass instead of largemouth bass, but that is another story!


I am a big fan of patience when stocking. Particularly when it comes to balanced ponds and trophy bass ponds. Trophy BG ponds probably don't need quite the patience. Although I think stocking grass shrimp and giving them a healthy jump start would be similar to GSH for bass...
Posted By: Greg Grimes Re: advice on forage fish - 07/21/09 12:44 PM
I understand the dynamics but do not have as much experience up north. However Walt it is EXTREMELY rare for me to see stunted bluegill anymore. One in 100 lakes we shock and only on lakes that receive heavy fishing pressure or some major high trash fish or gizzard shad population. I understand everything you (and I think CJ agree here) are saying. I again think it is easy to correct stunted bg add more bass. So if Jimmy wants good bass watch them if bluegill numbers continue to increase add a few more bass.
Posted By: Dave Davidson1 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/21/09 01:37 PM
Thanks Travis. I now remember that it was Mark Cornwell who wrote that article in the Mag. Personally, I don't think I have met a pond owner with 3 years of patience.

I find that the key to creating a big BG/big bass pond is the first year. Some BG will naturally get a growth jump start on the others in that first year. We call them "hog outs". Since they spawn here at 3 to 4 inches and live on fry of fatheads and small BG, they keep going. When the bass are added, they have a smorgasbord for the first 2 years and put on a lot of size.

Then the character builders start. The bass spawn and start picking off the smaller BG that are the future of the food chain. This is when we find that creating a nice balanced fishery is a lot easier than maintaining it. A whole lot easier.
Posted By: CJBS2003 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/21/09 01:50 PM
I agree Dave, it's hard to find anyone who can wait that long to stock bass.. I am in my second year of stocking forage in my pond and I am dying! I so want to put some bass in there!
Posted By: jimmydee Re: advice on forage fish - 07/21/09 03:32 PM
Wow!! Guys, thanks for taking the time and putting in the thoughtful advice for my little ole pond. I REALLY appreciate it. Some really good stuff.

I had a great spawn with the BG I put in last year, and the FHM went crazy. I know the bass I just added are in "hog heaven" right now. I will get 15-20 more 8-12" bass in there by the week end. Hopefully I've caught it early enough so that the bass can gobble up the overload of BG and bring this thing into a balance for decent BG and LMB.

My pond has thousands of tadpoles and small frogs in it also, so the LMB should have a pretty good variety for supper.

Again, guys, I'm overwhelmed with the time and effort you spent for me. Thanks soooo much.
Posted By: Dave Davidson1 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/21/09 04:19 PM
Be careful JD. You will no doubt notice that we often don't agree.

Maintaining a pond is like raising kids. It seems to change a lot over time and maintenance is always needed. No 2 are exactly alike and we can only speak in generalities. Sometimes it works and other times....
Posted By: jimmydee Re: advice on forage fish - 07/21/09 04:42 PM
DD, point well taken. I'm seeing some consistant general ideas, and I'll adapt them to my specific situation. But, again, thanks for the help guys.

I hope to have some pic of my little project up here soon. I'd like ya'lls feed back on that too when it happens.
Posted By: Sunil Re: advice on forage fish - 07/21/09 08:39 PM
"Sometimes it works and other times...." we just put on our white sneakers and wade into the pond.

Posted By: cougar Re: advice on forage fish - 07/24/09 02:48 AM
back from cozumel/progresso! been gazing at a really big pond, the good ole gulf of mexico...ate much seafood. my waiter in the dining room's name was Alongkot??! from Thailand
Wow I missed alot of discussion>>>>>>>>thanks to everyone for input!!

after reading all the posts, i think trying to manage for good sized of both bluegill and bass will be a little tricky even though I will thoroughly enjoy the managing(fishing) since my pond is about 30 feet from my backdoor. i have made my mind up to go more towards the larger bass. remember, i also will stock RES. i have gathered from these posts with this new goal in mind i should stock BG and be patient before stocking bass.

could y'all weigh in again with hard numbers(even if the advise differs) for stocking and also for when to stock what with my new goals in mind?--1 3/4 acre, 9ft max depth. lots of structure. NE Mississippi...should be full by spring...want LMB/BG/RES with the new goal of large bass over larger sunfish

Thanks again...also what forage species smaller than bluegill in your opinion should be stocked and when in relation to the stated species--LMB/BG/RES?
Posted By: CJBS2003 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/24/09 04:42 AM
OK, as stocking numbers and other details have been so controversial lately, I will say this is just my opinion. It may not be the right opinion. It is just an opinion...

I would get FHM stocked immediately. They can't go wrong.

In the spring I'd stock:

10 pounds of GSH
2500 BG
300 RES

The following spring I'd stock:

A truck load of TFS
50 F1 LMB
25 northern LMB
25 FL LMB

That should get you off to one heck of start towards growing some large bass!
Posted By: CAW25 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/24/09 05:21 AM
Cougar, I agree with CJB. I stocked 10 lbs. of fatheads this spring along with BG and some CC. The FH are constantly in spawning mode. It seems like the first batch spawned may be spawning already. I might be wrong. I'm not sure how long they take to reach maturity. It just seems impossible that the original 10 lbs have turned into what I now have. I bet I have 100 lbs. by now. My pond is about 1.5 acres and the entire perimeter is thick with fry. I can't imagine how thick they will be next year when I start stocking mature bass. They BG and CC are growing at incredible rates but haven't even begun to put a dent in the FH population. My BG have more than doubled in size and the CC have went from 3" to 5" to 10" to 12" since May. I still feed every day. The FH were relatively inexpensive and have been a great investment. My neighbor and I built ponds within a month or 2 of each other. We both stocked at the same time this spring. He went with all fingerlings and stocked LMB, BG, YP, GS, FH, and CC. The LMB are 4 or 5 inches now and the FH are already completely gone. He still has some GS. They gave his LMB a small head start but I don't consider it smart investment. Had he waited, who knows how much that 10 lbs. would have become. I can't begin to estimate how many I'll have next year.
Posted By: Greg Grimes Re: advice on forage fish - 07/24/09 01:38 PM
Cougar if the pond is half full I say go with Cj numbers but not reason not to do them all NOW. fhm, bg, res. Then next spring threadfin shad and the bass in June. keep in mind it may be difficult to get all three subspecies of lmb at the sametime. If faced with dilema there I feel your fine with 75 F1 and that is it.
Posted By: Ric Swaim Re: advice on forage fish - 07/25/09 02:01 AM
cougar, As I said earlier, I like waiting on the bass. IMO you can actually LOOSE a years growth by putting the bass in with the forage fish. By waiting a year for the base of the new pond's forage to multiply & completly fill the void & then stock bass they will have a better chance of reaching they're greatest potiential size.
IMO if you take this approach you're bass will be larger & have a better w/r than your neighbors in 2 yrs.
Posted By: cougar Re: advice on forage fish - 07/25/09 05:44 AM
not quite half full. not sure about putting in lepomis yet--though I bet i've already got a few GSF, GO GSFA!

i plan to be very patient, Ric, with the bass stocking.

thanks for the advice cj

who would y'all recommend to buy fish from considering i live in NE Miss.? Don't have a clue.

also anyone care to give me a ballpark estimate of a total price for the numbers cj suggested?

thanks
Posted By: Walt Foreman Re: advice on forage fish - 07/25/09 05:45 AM
I would have to agree with Greg. Until I see hard numbers in a scientific study showing a clear benefit from waiting a year, it just seems like a nice theory to me. I've read multiple posts on here in the past month about pond owners in AL who are getting three pounds a year growth from their F-1s, in more than one instance catching ten-pound bass that are three years old, and I'm pretty sure that the bass weren't stocked a year after the bluegill and other forage in any of those. Wasn't at least one of those ponds a client of yours, Greg?

If you want a pond full of forage, stock a bunch of forage (lots of FHM, 1000 or more bluegill per acre, threadfin shad) when you stock the bass. Just stocking 1000 bluegill per acre will give a pond a bluegill-heavy dynamic that the bass will never be able to tip short of very heavy fishing pressure on the bluegill coupled with no bass ever being kept for years. Unless a different strain of bluegill that isn't known throughout the U.S. for overpopulating ponds, is being mentioned in these recommendations, all it takes for bass to have all the forage they can ever hope to eat is to stock heavy on the bluegill initially and not keep any bluegill. And if a pond owner wanted to stock threadfin, or gizzard shad in a larger pond, if good numbers of those are stocked initially, especially in conjunction with bluegill, the bass are going to have all they could possibly eat. If it's better initial growth that this method aims for, that's easily accomplished simply by stocking a large number of FHM initially. By the time the bass have gone through the fatheads the bluegill will already be well on their way to ubiquity.

I would be all for this idea if it were proven; even as a theory I probably wouldn't have any opinion one way or the other if it weren't for the fact that it requires a pond owner to wait a year that very likely is just a wasted year said owner could have bass growing just as fast in his pond as they will once they're finally stocked. I know that there was an article (in Pond Boss?) on this management plan; I don't remember any data in the way of a study. And, if the study wasn't done with prolific forage such as bluegill and shad, then here again it would be flawed. If, on the other hand, I just didn't read carefully and there has been a study or studies in which ponds stocked with prolific forage a year before bass were compared with ponds stocked with prolific forage at the same time as bass, and the delayed-bass ponds had better growth, I'll eat my humble pie and consider myself a little wiser.
Posted By: MikeyBoy Re: advice on forage fish - 07/25/09 06:35 AM
Now I am like the ultimate newbie on this, but isn't the whole idea of stocking forage a year earlier just a way to save some money.

If you give them time to spawn you have to spend less on the original stockers? Otherwise just spend more stocking to begin with and have the bass sooner?

I thought that was the whole thing about it.
Posted By: CJBS2003 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/25/09 09:43 AM
With FHM and GSH in particular it is a way to save money. 5 pounds of FHM becomes easily 50 pounds of FHM a year later. GSH are similar...

For growing trophy bass, I am a big fan in forage fish stock piling, particularly in southern waters. In more northern waters, one has to be careful particularly if you include BG as forage fish.
Posted By: esshup Re: advice on forage fish - 07/25/09 12:39 PM
It might be a way of lessing a pondmeisters chance on introducing unwanted species as well. i.e. Your chance of getting an unwanted fish species is larger with a bigger amount of FH stockers, correct?
Posted By: Dave Davidson1 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/25/09 01:02 PM
Walt, I believe that we will continue to disagree with timing on stocking predators. I don't recall, nor have I looked for, scientific evidence on either practice.

I know an extremely well established forage base works for me and will continue to do it. Your mileage evidently varies.

No matter what practice is used, our biggest problem in the deep South continues to be bass heavy ponds after about the 3rd or 4th year. For this, timing isn't a factor. Lack of maintenance is.
Posted By: Walt Foreman Re: advice on forage fish - 07/25/09 01:20 PM
I would agree that lack of maintenance can lead to bass-heavy ponds. Twenty years ago, not nearly as many anglers practiced catch-and-release, but as anglers caught on, this practice was misapplied to ponds. Anglers thought they were doing the pond a favor, when in fact, for the bass fishing at least, they were hurting it. But I've also seen many ponds in which the bass had been overfished, allowing the bluegill to overpopulate to the point that the bass could not spawn successfully and there were only a handful of bass left, or in some cases, none left.
Posted By: CJBS2003 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/25/09 01:24 PM
Yes esshup... Sorting 5 pounds of FHM is a hole lot easier than 50 pounds! Having read enough posts on here, stock contamination is unfortunately way too common. It concerns me greatly considering I am doing a RES only pond with no desire for reproducing BG. So when I go to stock RES, I sure hope they aren't contaminated. I also hand sorted all the forage fish I have already put in the pond.
Posted By: jeffhasapond Re: advice on forage fish - 07/25/09 04:52 PM
Wouldn't you know that a discussion such as this occurs when I'm at my pond property with limited to no internet connection.

For the most part this has been a respectful discussion. Let's keep it that way and help to provide a learning experience.

Although I realize that a stocking plan would be an "it depends" type of situation I would really like to know the opinion of several of our forum experts as to the advantages or disadvantages of a "stock everything now" or a "stock forage and wait" approaches to pond stocking.

Mark Cornwell, based upon his Pond Boss magazine biography, is a professor in the fisheries department at the University Of New York. He is a very well known and well respected individual. Has he written a similar article as the one above discussion pond stocking in southern waters? I found the article above fasinating!

I think this can become a fantastic thread if we can get some input from some of our well known and well respected experts. I'd really like to hear from Dr. Dave Wills, The Pond Doctor - Wild Bill Cody, Eric West, and obviously Bob Lusk. Any chance of some additional input to this thread?

Please note my request above is not meant to discount the experience or expertise of any one that has posted to this thread.
Posted By: Greg Grimes Re: advice on forage fish - 07/25/09 07:02 PM
Ok in a hurry so I apologize if brief. Please do not take this as arrogance. I can grow the heck out of big bass in a hurry. It is kinda frustrating to read all of these theories on what works. We have tired it all and can tell you what works. If you guys come to PB I will have a talk about it.
This thread is all over the place. What does it mean wait a year??? I agree if up north probably not good. Ok now should you wait a year in the south? It depends on what is stocked and when. The key is good forage base for quality/trophy bass as described by cougar. This means higher than normal stocking rates 2000/bg/ac will not be too many if done right. If stocked summer- fall- winter – up to early March you can turn around and stock bass come June. Especially if stocked with fhm as well. Yes we get bass to over 3 lbs in 16 months (October year after bass went in in June). Even better than this for some. Can you wait until the following June sure but why? If you want to stock many less fish then sure that would work to built up even more forage. That is the only case I suggest waiting. Now if pond is not ready and you put bg in in April/May as 1-2” then yes you would wait a year and put bass in the following June. Get it? I hope this makes sense. Cougar if your pond if half full I see no reason at all to wait on lepomis stocking they do well with stocking with the fhm both built up populations and then follow with June bass. It will work if followed. If you wait another year on bass you lost a year they will still grow with similar growth rates the following year. IN fact other theories hold in some cases then you got so many bluegill the intermediate size bluegill may compete with fingerling bass for similar food source.

Cougar tons of hatcheries in ARK. If you want referral let me know. If you want to compare prices here are our prices to give you some idea. http://lakework.com/site/fish-stocking.php
I might even help you out when coming back from ark run if interested. Good luck.
Posted By: ewest Re: advice on forage fish - 07/25/09 11:32 PM
You guys should read PB mag. \:\) Couple issues back was an article on the subject of LMB growth and forage in the south. I will put parts below then we can discuss.

Actual data from study so you can compare to my text.

Ponds were stocked with bluegills (mean weight 1.4 g) in mid March 2003 at a rate of

3,705 fish ha–1. The bluegill stocking rate was 50% higher than normally recommended

as we attempted to maximize food resources for largemouth bass (Masser

1992). Largemouth bass (mean weight 1.8 g) were stocked into the ponds at the

standard rate of 248 fish ha–1 (Swingle 1950b) in late May 2003, after bluegills had

spawned.



THE CUTTING EDGE – SCIENCE REVIEW
By Eric West





A recent article of interest Population Size, Survival, and Growth of Largemouth Bass One Year After Stocking in Four Ponds by Steve M. Sammons, and Michael J. Maceina, in 2005 Proceedings of the Annual Conference Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 59:241–250.



I will point out that based on studies like this and their personal observations private fisheries scientist presenters at last year’s Pond Boss Convention recommended stocking small bluegill at 2000 per acre (twice the old stocking rate) in southern largemouth bass ponds to achieve good growth rates. Notice good growth rates not trophy LMB. The use of the word trophy in the study refers to Anderson Wr and condition indices not 10lb LMB. Note Proportional Stock Density (PSD). Three new size categories - preferred, memorable, and trophy - were developed to accompany previously established stock and quality lengths.


Due to the high bluegill stocking rate (150% of the normal suggested rate), largemouth bass presumably had an abundant food supply. The relatively low density of largemouth

bass, coupled with an assumed unlimited food supply, allowed these fish to forage at close to maximum rates, leading to rapid growth and high condition or relative

weight.



Bioenergetic models estimated that the largemouth bass population in these ponds consumed between 132 and 171 kg ha (roughly 150 lbs per acre) of bluegills in the first 300 days after stocking to maintain the observed growth.



Each population of largemouth bass was predicted to have consumed 4.2 to 6.7 times their own biomass in bluegills in 300 days to maintain these growth rates and biomass.


Recent research has revealed consumption-dependent error in many bioenergetic models, including the one used in this study, which was particularly large when growth rates were fast . Thus, the percent of maximum consumption by largemouth bass estimated in this study were likely underestimated which probably indicates that the bluegill densities in the ponds used in this study may not be great enough to meet predator demand in the future, leading to slower growth, poorer condition, and a possibly lower production of trophy-sized fish.


The fact that the high consumption rates of largemouth bass found in this study were probably underestimated serves as warning of how delicate predator-prey balances are in small ponds, and how easily predator demand can exceed prey supply if predator densities are not strictly controlled . One of the most common themes on the Pond Boss Forum is overabundant largemouth bass in ponds. This study plus current recommendations of 2000 stock size bluegill per acre appear to be a remedy for the tendency of southern ponds to quickly (2 to 3 years) get bass crowded.



Actual text :

Thus, the P-value and

consumption by largemouth bass estimated in this study were likely underestimates,

which may indicate that the bluegill densities in the ponds we used in this study may

not be great enough to meet predator demand in the future, leading to slower growth,

poorer condition, and a possibly lower production of trophy-sized fish.
Subsequent year classes of largemouth

bass in these systems are not likely to exhibit the fast growth observed in this study,

as largemouth bass densities increase (Irwin et al. 2003).

However, the fact

that the high consumption rates of largemouth bass found in this study may have

been underestimates serves as warning of how delicate predator-prey balances are

in small ponds, and how easily predator demand can exceed prey supply if predator

densities are not strictly controlled (Geihsler and Holder 1983).



This was in fertilized ponds with small stocker fish BG (1500 per acre) in March followed by LMB (100 per acre) in late may after the BG had spawned. Results were fast initial growth in LMB with the forage base being overeaten if viewed in terms of continued ability to sustain the pond. Other studies upon which this one relied showed in older ponds up to 1.5 X LMB per acre with diminished forage and slow growth.

Posted By: Theo Gallus Re: advice on forage fish - 07/26/09 01:10 AM
Eric, do you have the author's permission to reprint that? ;\)
Posted By: Dave Davidson1 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/26/09 01:42 AM
Ok, so they stocked LMB AFTER BG had spawned once. It didn't work. That's why I like BG and Fatheads that I can walk on before adding LMB. And, even when I wait a year, I often wind up with too dang many bass compared to forage. Lots more than I can cull.

However, this is a controlled pond. Lots of mileage can vary.
Posted By: ewest Re: advice on forage fish - 07/26/09 02:48 AM
The study or the PB article ? ;\)

Yep and cited.
Posted By: cougar Re: advice on forage fish - 07/26/09 04:54 AM
I am embarrassed that I haven't been a regular subscriber to pond boss mag. I shall remedy that!

Thanks for the input on the #'s from everyone.

Thanks Greg, I'd love to talk with you...so you are a fish supplier?

Thanks for that info Eric--by the way, my name is Matt Waldrop==cougar is the mascot of the school at which i teach/coach

i also need to learn to post some pics on here!
Posted By: CJBS2003 Re: advice on forage fish - 07/26/09 05:02 AM
A subscription really is well worth the money. Also, look at the archives of past years of PB that Bill Cody put together in the archives section. You can see if any other past issues have stuff of interest to you. You can then order that specific issue. Or, if you got a bunch of cash to burn you can even order every single PB mag from day one!

Greg is a fish supplier and biologist, you wanna grow big bass he is the man to help you. What do you teach and what sport(s) do you coach?

Open up a photobucket account, I have found that the easiest way to post pics on here.
Posted By: jimmydee Re: advice on forage fish - 07/27/09 05:29 PM
Guys, as usual, this is great a conversation. There is obviously a discussion of "all at one time" or "forage fish first" concept. Personally, I stocked my 3/4 A. 12'deep newely built pond with forage fish last fall, 250 3-5" BG, and 150 2"RES, with 10 lbs of FHM. I added about 30 +/- adult BG & RES (7-12") also.

Unfortunatly, a 'buddy' added seveal LMB to the mix last fall at my displeasure. I was trying to do the "forage first" method, so I don't know what effect these 'early' LMB had on my pond. So, I guess I am doing a 'blended forage first' 'all together' concept. Shoot!

By it's appearance, the FHM and BG had an awesome spawn this spring and summer, and a late spawn with the adult BG added last year. In the last three weeks I have added aprox 20 9-12" LMB from two different ponds/lakes, and will add about 8-10 more that size before summer is over. I sheppishly added a total of 7 adult crappie. Dang it! I just couldn't help my self, and it was done before I came to my sences.lol.

I have caught several stocked BG to see how they were growing, etc, and the shoulders on these little guys and their coloration leads me to believe that my pond is a healthy pond.

I will bore you with the details of my "fall evaluation" in November when I have something to report. Thanks for all the unique conversation and opinions. That's what makes, and keeps this site fun to check into daily.
Posted By: ewest Re: advice on forage fish - 07/27/09 07:02 PM
jimmydee did the LMB your buddy put in spawn this spring? If so I would hold up on adding more LMB for now.
Posted By: jimmydee Re: advice on forage fish - 07/27/09 08:53 PM
ewest, I just had a 'heart to heart' with my buddy on the bass thingy from last year. He honestly only put in one bass, along with the adult BG he put in. So, I THINK I'm in fairly good shape with the bass population.

He's a great guy, and I believe him BUT,I found it very unusual that he only put in ONE bass, and I caught it!!!! Heck, I only fished the little 3/4 A. pond three times last fall - and caught that ONE BASS. Interesting.....lol
© Pond Boss Forum